>>1208958>How do we fix /n/?On it's face, it doesn't need to be 'fixed'. The overall traffic here is about as low as any board, threads can be neglected for days and still be above Page 10, so there's plenty of room for everyone and their interests.
However the problem is the severe autists who throw childish fits because, for reasons no one can fathom, they don't like bicycles, even if you're talking in the lowest-common-denominator terms of using them to get from Point 'A' to Point 'B'. You talk about any other aspect of bicycles or cycling, and they completely lose their shit and sperg out like you've never seen, 110% triggered.
Banning the severely autistic types who react like above is a non-starter, since even though they can *hide* threads they don't like, they obsessively and autistically insist on sperging out all over them anyway, completely irrational.
If I owned 4chan, my solution would be to create /bike/ or /cycling/, and use /n/ as a containment board for these irrational severely autistic types and their train fixation, and assign a full-time team of janitors and moderators to the new cycling board with a zero-tolerance policy for any escapees of /n/ who, for reasons only their addled brains comprehend, they'd bother the cyclists on their own board. Cycling-interested anons who mistakenly posted on /n/ after that would have their threads moved to the new board (no reason to punish them for an honest mistake).
Sadly Japmoot isn't going to make a whole new board just for cyclists, even if 10000 of us demanded it, I think. Therefore the only viable solution is a zero-tolerance policy against the anti-cycling autists bothering perfectly innocent cyclists who are contained in their own threads on /n/. To that end there needs to be more active moderation of /n/, and a clear, unmistakable policy statement from Japmoot that all cycling threads are welcome on /n/.
