>>1232571fuck off lol
>>1232472As a bicycle, this is a shit bicycle. But I do see the appeal, and I think overall it's fairly well conceived and equipped. Not a bad buy.
I doubt it will last for years though. And it is definitely shite for riding as a bicycle. But yeah, you could do worse.
What I don't like is it's not a steel frame, it's alluminium, even the fucking fork is alluminium, it's not going to have a comfy ride, and the tires aren't wide enough, or clearance wide enough either to be comfy. It only comes in one size, if you're tall, you'll be cramped on it. It's a woman's bike, the reach is short. and it's absurdly overgeared. There are no low gears. It's useless for pedalling slowly. For a vehichle that is basically designed to cheat infrastructure and share spaces with pedestrians, having a 48x28 low gear is absurd, you just can't ride it slowly. If you had to drag this 22kg monolith up a hill without a charge i think you'd probably die.
And I wonder, why this over a 50cc scooter? You could spend half the money and get a decent used scooter.
It really just strikes me as a version of pic related.
