/n/ - Transportation » Thread #1271786

[22 / 4 / ?]

127KiB, 601x508, IMG_3654.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 03:54:44 No.1271786 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>1271788

>The B787 is such an amazing airliner!! :D

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_9586.jpg, 1MiB, 3264x2448

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 03:56:02 No.1271787 Report

Quoted By:

Well it actually is

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 03:57:06 No.1271788 Report

Quoted By: >>1271802 >>1272006

>>1271786
A thread died for this.
Also fuck off the 787 has made airfare to Asia fucking cheap. While it's a high pitched skytube you still can't deny the effects it's had on ticket prices.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_9593.jpg, 888KiB, 3264x2448

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 03:59:51 No.1271790 Report

Quoted By: >>1272192

>MIA-NRT when?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 04:10:15 No.1271802 Report

Quoted By: >>1271807 >>1271841

>>1271788

>Make a plane with plastic instead of heavier aluminum.
>Wow the 787 is such a cool plane

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 04:22:34 No.1271807 Report

Quoted By: >>1271808

>>1271802
Opposed to what? All modern aircraft are built with carbon fiber composites. The A350 is just as plasticy as the 787. The A330neo is just a A330 with plastic wings. What are you trying to get at here?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 04:23:26 No.1271808 Report

Quoted By:

>>1271807
the airbus ones arent shit tho

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 04:38:23 No.1271814 Report

Quoted By:

In terms of CASM Airbus gets btfo. If the Airbus aircraft deliver more in terms of profitablity or value as you would suggest why does Boeing have 1300 787s in their backlog opposed to the 890 in the A350 backlog?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 05:26:18 No.1271841 Report

Quoted By: >>1271971 >>1272206

>>1271802
Oh yeah, larger windows, high humidty, higher cabin pressure, and hundreds of newly economical city pairs are totally a bad thing.

Just neck yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 17:10:18 No.1271971 Report

Quoted By: >>1272023

>>1271841
If comfort is what you are for then you're born in the wrong era. The 787 is for the airlines to make even more money. It's one of the biggest memes in aviation fucking ugly ass plane with ugly engines one more gayliner is one less 747-400

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 18:52:48 No.1272006 Report

Quoted By: >>1272063

>>1271788
>Also fuck off the 787 has made airfare to Asia fucking cheap.
You mean A330 and cheap Chinese labor.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 19:21:19 No.1272023 Report

Quoted By:

>>1271971
747 is getting phased out of passenger service for a reason. Just move to a major freight hub if you want to jerk off to 747's taking off and landing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 21:07:55 No.1272063 Report

Quoted By: >>1272068 >>1272079

>>1272006
Never knew United, American, ANA and JAL flew A330s to Asia. In fact every airline in the us that flys A330s fly them to Europe. Stop being dumb.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 21:28:33 No.1272068 Report

Quoted By: >>1272078

>>1272063
Delta flies A330s to Asia though

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 21:35:23 No.1272078 Report

Quoted By:

>>1272068
No they don't. Delta flys A350s/777s to Asia expect one flight out of DTW to NGO. They use their A330s for trans Atlantic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Jan 2019 21:35:28 No.1272079 Report

Quoted By: >>1272204

>>1272063
Chinese airlines fly A330 to long haul destinations and it's those Chinese airlines that bring the fare down

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Jan 2019 02:17:04 No.1272192 Report

Quoted By:

>>1271790
Probably at the same time as the 77X

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Jan 2019 02:55:50 No.1272204 Report

Quoted By: >>1272205 >>1272282

>>1272079
Trans-Pacific? Other than from LAX to SHE and CAN to YVR what other routes do A330s do from asia to north america?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Jan 2019 02:56:32 No.1272205 Report

Quoted By: >>1272210

>>1272204
NRT-LAX
NRT-SEA

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Jan 2019 03:02:46 No.1272206 Report

Quoted By:

>>1271841
>Larger windows
Not needed meme
>High humidity
Dry air is better for pax compartment. Only flight deck should have proper AC.
>higher cabin pressure
Passengers will be more awake, and will disturb balance of plane by walking to toilet more often.
Plus, unneeded stress on plactique.

They should've made 787, but with tiny windows, classic dry cool air conditioning for passengers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Jan 2019 03:11:28 No.1272210 Report

Quoted By:

>>1272205
>NRT-LAX
UA32 787
NH5 777
JL 61 777
AA 169 787
SQ 11 777
>NRT-SEA
DL 166 767
NH 178 787

What did you mean by this?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_20190108_161215.jpg, 69KiB, 1009x182

Anonymous Tue 08 Jan 2019 08:13:20 No.1272282 Report

Quoted By:

>>1272204
How about these?
And there are obviously more 33x going from China to Europe than America because of range

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches