>>1294632>hmm i wonder why governmentsBecause crops are needed to feed people. The moment transportion is competing with food, you have a insane global hunger riots just waiting to rip society apart.
That might seem simple, but its a complex issue because once investigated it turns into a Oroboros:
1. There is enough food for everyone
2. If you biofuel, there isn't
3. So you need to grow more food
4. If you monoculture for short term gains in agriculture, you decrease the total supply, making the situation worse
5. The free marked isn't good at dealing with agriculture, but occasionally do
6. Government is generally bad at dealing with free marked because subsidiaries are not a reasonable solution to long term growth.
tl:dr
by allowing biofuel, its government subsidiary
But not at scale, because of agriculture
>and tech giantsThey do invest. But just converting regular engines to biofuel means the engine will wear more. Worn out.
And again: You are not competing against fuel prices, you are competing against food prices as well. So if biofuel makes food scarce, growing food is more profitable, ergo the feedback will restraint growth and expansion of biofuels.
>>1294656>60.000Thats barely any driving at all. Thats like 2-5 years of driving
Most cars reach 200.000
Then whatever isn't riddled with factory problems might reach 300.000
400.000 is feasible if spare parts still exists by then
You could go further, but somewhere past this every part besides the shell and frame has been replaced once. So its not longer that automobile, its Theseus automobile
