>>1294161This. I personally would never take the train, but I have no problem with the people who like trains. I have no problem with the people who want to make a nation where people spend their entire lives within the confines of trains. I have no problem with people who want to use hundreds of square miles to use a 20000th of the earths land to make a O scale replica of the earth (and then another one in that model where the model is in terms of the model). I have no problem with people who advocate for non-geothermal energy. I have no problem with people who advocate for light vehicle elevated roads. I have no problem with people who enjoy keirin. I have no problem with people who ride bicycles in places other than public roads and sidewalks. I have no problem with people who like maritime transit. I have no problem with the city planning enthusiasts, so long as they are not degenerate leftists seeking to exert their will onto others through undue force.
I have a problem with bikefags. I have a problem with electric car faggots. I have a problem with publicly funded public transit faggots. I have a problem with commie faggots and authoritarian/statist faggots. I have a problem with lighter than air enthusiasts (but it is a purely pragmatic and moral issue due to what I consider to be deliberate waste of finite resources).
You want to route rail lines door to door and automate the system? Sounds good to me. Shit idea, but I want to see it happen.
You want to make lanes 20 feet wide? I approve.
Minimum vertical clearance of 40 feet? I approve.
You want to build an arcology? You're a massive faggot, but go ahead. Hell, I'll even kick in a few tourism bux going to take a tour of your 12 dorito factories.
City planning before the first building goes up? I whole heartedly approve.
Sea steading? Yes please.
Drone freight? Absolutely.
Sea dragon rockets? 100 percent.
Nuclear excavation to separate America and Mexico and create a 1 mile wide 100 yard deep canal? Yes.
