hmm i wonder why governments and tech giants wont get behind biofuels even though they are carbon neutral??.

it couldn't have anything to do with the corn lobby, patents, and the inability of them to fully control it in government monopolized corporations???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-ethanol_fuel_cell
>The DEFC, similar to the DMFC, relies upon the oxidation of ethanol on a catalyst layer to form carbon dioxide. Water is consumed at the anode and is produced at the cathode.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae_fuel
>Algae fuel, algal biofuel, or algal oil is an alternative to liquid fossil fuels that uses algae as its source of energy-rich oils. Also, algae fuels are an alternative to commonly known biofuel sources, such as corn and sugarcane.[1][2] Several companies and government agencies are funding efforts to reduce capital and operating costs and make algae fuel production commercially viable.[3] Like fossil fuel, algae fuel releases CO2 when burnt, but unlike fossil fuel, algae fuel and other biofuels only release CO2 recently removed from the atmosphere via photosynthesis as the algae or plant grew.

hmm why would the government want to control ENERGY??? Why does saudi arabia actively promote the global warming conspiracy??? Why do solar cycles correlate with the historic mean temperature??

Yeah citizens.. you shouldn't be able to harness nuclear energy without OUR PERMISSION mmwahhahahhahahahahhahaa

HUrr durr toxic batteries liable to explode any second are better for the environment than cooking oil and alcohol....

a bic lighter has ten times the energy of an iphone battery and is less likely to burn your dick off