>>1318962>They aren't even ChineseIf that's how you see it, then your definition of 'Chinese' must be exclusively Han. The definition of 'Chinese' in China is simply those who are native to any territories currently controlled by either Chinese states. It's the equivalent of Japanese/Yamato, all Yamato are Japanese, but not all Japanese are Yamato.
>2. The Chinese monarchy have not changed even since BC300 from Han dynastyOnly if you ignore the blatant Judaic influences on China since the Ming Dynasty.
>Your translation is incorrect even Google would be betterI've only translated it for those who do not have the slightest clue on what I'm talking about. The full name is "Taiping Tianguo", as "Tianguo" means 'Heavenly State/Kingdom', it would be more convenient for both the readers and I to shorten the name, considering "ping" means 'peace'. This is such a desperate nitpick.
>There was also dozens of other non-religious rebellion and other rebellion based on other religion that were occurring simultaneously as Taiping rebellion.No there wasn't, you're grossly over exaggerating the amount of rebellions, which were at most 5. Not that it helps your argument, if anything, it clearly shows the extent of Jewish meddling in Chinese society.
>Its suppression was powered by weapons that are given to Chinese government by western powerAnd? International Jewry was rooted into the western powers far before the east, it had only taken its present form in the 20th century.
>That's Chinese characteristic not Jewish characteristic>Again that's Chinese characteristicThose are Chinese actions under the influence of Jews, what a pathetic attempt at projection, it's obvious you're of at least partial Jewish-descent.
