>>1345011Yes, that's true!
But makes me angry is the lifestyle of the rural AND city people. They harm the environment much more than the concentration camp resident, because they:
-claim a lot of land (per person), which was taken away from nature
-heat more m2 than the concentration camp resident
-have heating on to a higher temperature
-Consume more ressources for heating despite energy renovations, because there are fewer heated rooms in a concentration camp than in a single-family home. The officer's barracks grow to the second power and the inmate capacity to the third power. For a large block: little heated officer barracks (= heat loss) per inmate. In a single-family home or block of flats: Many heated rooms per resident. (see
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/KZ_Auschwitz)
-Consume foods that go beyond the essentials
-buy stuff (which is often the biggest part in CO2 footprint)
-have less efficient transportation because they think that cattle wagons are not good enough for them
-need more infrastructure (outside the concentration camp you need a lot more pipes, roads, rails, etc. to provide enough for the same number of people as in the concentration camp)
-indulge in environmentally harmful activities that the detainee hardly does because it is forbidden
-consume more crap because they can easily store it in their big homes
-have more clothes because they can store them and they often have multiple hobbies while the inmate just has work
-fuck the environment by, for example, washing their car ILLEGAL in their own garden or changing oil and simply letting 10ml of oil drop on the lawn, etc.
And this was just a small part!
People not living in concentration camps or gulags deserve a bullet to their head.
