>>1346268>cager"self-identifies as a fringie, therefore everything that follows is more or less irrelevant"
>..is not without its effects on othersGuess what? We're the *majority*, therefore according to the rules of society, tough shit for someone like you, deal with it. Or stop trying to iceskate uphill and enjoy what benefits modern civilization and society has to offer instead of raging impotently against it.
>human civilization should be abolished and we should go back to tiny tribes, this time with high technology to prevent resource struggles causing conflict again"""Throwing the baby out with the bathwater"""
This is why no one listens to you: extremist, fringe-element attitudes and opinions, that would hurt the vast majority of everyone, benefitting basically no one.
>The more humans there are, the less free an individual is. Simple as.Yeah, sure. We'll just go back to stone knives an bearskins, just to suit (((You))).
Instead, I propose you go live on Public Land somewhere, in a lean-to built with all-natural materials, and you can forrage for your supper, eschewing all modern conveniences and contact with all the horrible modern people you despise so much. Enjoy living until you're maybe 40 if you're lucky, assuming an animal doesn't kill you, you die of misadventure, or disease doesn't finish you off.
Fact of the matter is: you're one of those whiny crybabies who says he hates the modern world SO MUCH, thinks he was born centuries too late, but you won't give up your smartphone, computer, grocery store down the street, access to medical care, mechanized transportation of any type, and so on, and would last maybe 3 days out on your own in the wild before giving up and coming back -- yet you want to brow-beat everyone else into giving up everything we've built up.
People like you are a pain in civilizations' ass.
You want to help civilzation? Go away, far away.
