>>1359830>So the only people not going to work anymore are people who work an office job, so... a small fraction of the total amount of commuters?Small fraction? Have you ever been outside of your mom's basement?
I don't know, maybe in your country it is not a thing, but in all countries (with different level of development) I have visited so far it look like majority of commuters, more then half, work in some sort of office environment (accountants, programmers, even some engineers, etc.) and their can absolutely work remotely. Small fraction (25%) are probably people who work with their hands (i.e. plumbers, electricians and such.).
>Parts of whom already work from home anyway? That is really small percentage. I would say less than 5%.
>Work is far from the only thing attracting people to cities (thank fuck).You might not like the truth, but yes. More jobs offers, often highers salaries.
>educationI don't know for sure. But what is 100% sure, finding school where you don't have n*ggers and other low-tier thugs in city is difficult.
>social and leisure activities plus all kinds of Like what, I'm just curious what do you mean under this.
>economic and logistic activity would cease. Logistic has ceased already, because it is fucking traffic jam and moving anything there is a pain.
What do you mean by economic activity?
>It's utter nobsense. Your """theory""" sounds like the urban planning equivalent of flatearthism.It is real solution, which will solve all problems.
Cities are thing of a past, when you had a lot of industries, which required manual labor.
Cities were basically built around factories and workers. All your historical tram lines were constructed so they can get more workers to more factories.
At some point, we has switched from industry to service era. But people kinda tend to live where they used to live, which caused cancer like travelling 50+ kilometers each day to push couple buttons in office.
