>>1388832>but focusing on community for fulfillment instead of material desires will greatly alleviate such issues yet nobody seems to address it.It's not consumerism/materialism that is 'bad' for the environment, it is consumerism/materialism focused on disposable goods and being a trendy faggot.
>Not to say that there isn't room for improvement in the American lifestyleHere are some that I (would) find acceptable:
- Non-onions based meat stretchers (breed/genetically engineer quinoa to be pea sized or something)
- Freedom gardens
- A non-retarded use for grey water (read as: doesn't concentrate detergents and fuck the soil)
- Composting
- Sorting plastics waste
- Sorting out electronics, glass, and metal waste
- Sorting out paper waste
- Being paid for my recyclables, if you don't then fuck off - I am going to stockpile them until I have a few tons and/or burn them
- Paying marginally more for products overall in exchange for longer lasting products; so long as it is cheaper overall
- Drone delivery for food/etc (reduces store runs for 1-2 items)
- Being taxed according to vehicle weight and amount of road usage, so long as there were no fuel taxes and leftism was banned so that there was no graft
- Concrete homes
- Heat integration for the home, so long as each element had redundancy (This means your refrigerator pre-heats water for the water heater, etc)
- underground walk-in freezer to store sides of beef
- solar powered LED grow houses (about half of america suffers from hail)
- automated microfarming (I want to be able to lay down rails over an acre or two, and only have to check it every week or two)
- synthesized gasoline from sea water, so long as it was exempt from fuel taxes - so that it would be the same cost or cheaper.
Note: the $5-8/gal figures are from faggots who can't read reports properly. Those cost figures are from the military building oceanic TEG powr plants to ensure production capability. The real cost would be in the $1-3/gal range.
