>>1412768>>1413114>Doubtno doubt about it, it has been proven for years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQsVi3fLpKcthe brace position is specifically designed and implemented to minimize G force damage. a 3 point seat belt would actually make it worse, as it holds you in the worst position to take G forces
> Everyone would make it differently,no. FAA (and pretty much everyone else) requires various features on seats to be standard, even if the actual appearance is different
>As for dissipation of energy, three point belt is better, than lap belt, because crashing into seat in front of you is not a good way to do sohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvbGiuKbmGMsee above video. the G forces do not go in one direction in a crash, they go at an angle. the brace position, as well as the folding motion of the seats, dissipates the energy going forward and upwards, slowing the motion of the body. the three point system would not help, as it would not dampen the motion of either direction. the seat does not stay still during the crash, they fold over to cancel out the forward force, and the bottoms bend in the frame to cancel out the upward force
>How about making interior that won't turn into projectiles during crash?not possible. large sections of the interior is going to come apart in any crash, as its extremely likely that the frame itself will be damaged, and objects inside will come loose. the seats are bolted into the ground and have panels inside of them to protect against debris, this is by far the best protection against this, as has been proven by years of testing
>Current seatbelt there is to cause injuriesschizo logic
>Because you don't have a proper seatbeltthe seat belt is fine. the seatbelt operation is more simple than that of a 3 point system, and is demonstrated on each flight
there is a wealth of information available for you on this topic, including official FAA reports and documentaries. look those up before coming here and spouting drivel.
