>>1482446>It's not worth the hassle and very far from the required energy density.Actualy it would save a lot of fuel and maintainance in short haul flights.
>And it's the shitiest battery technology ever for transportation, a complete deadend.Not at all, it has an awesome energy density, can deliver more than enough powe, is reasonably safe and affordable enough.
Lead acid batteries on the other hand are total crap.
>>1482445Islands exist and in some cases the demand isn't constant enough for a rail line to be worth it.
But sure, there should also be more rail competing with airlines.
>>1482471Sure anon, they alway explode when reaching 4,21 V per cell.
>>1482474Don't give german politicians bad ideas...
