>>1516216Not him but
>dropping the kids off at school, getting the groceries, and taking an elderly relative to the doctor, is all unimportant work which is in no way related to the economy>people who do these tasks cannot also be employed so their convenience is irrelevant >muh economy>muh gainfully employed commutersYou're serving as a perfect example of the kind of bias that this article is highlighting. Even if, as you claim it's not sexism but merely discriminating against people given the bulk of familial tasks.
Also, feminism is about equal opportunity, gender egalitarianism AND improving the lives for women who fit into traditional gender roles. Traditional gender roles are in many instances quite natural and upheld not by forced social conventions, but by people's individual choices. Beyond that, forced traditional gender roles DO still exist quite prevalently in society, in which case, those women should be supported.
I'll just remind you again anon. This is just 1, valid, way of viewing this issue. It isn't given much weight on the whole. It's certainly not what I would frame the discussion around. In a large report it would deserve a paragraph. But it's not nothing.
