>>1519111> I simply said that cops pull over people without probable causeI never said that they don't. However, I did say that it is not technically legal to do so, outside of certain special cases. But now that you insist that this is a hole in my logic, I'll actually say that this doesn't matter at all. Just because a cop can pull people over for no reason, doesn't mean that they wouldn't have valid reason to pull somebody over in this specific case, which they definitely do, because he was driving dangerously around a slow intersection.
> which makes you insist that in this case he'd get pulled over 100%Never said that. I've now told you twice that it's not objective fact, but common sense. You haven't challenged this common sense, but instead you're lying about my statements, and asking why this point is relevant at all.
> he did nothing wrong or illegalI claim that he was driving dangerously, and that driving dangerously is wrong. I can't help but notice that you repeatedly state that what he did was dangerous, but not wrong. My argument could end there, but I'll repeat myself and say that people absolutely are pulled over for dangerous driving.
I've been extremely clear about my positions, is there any lingering confusion that you have?
Try reading this if you're still confused:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reckless_driving> In United States law, reckless driving is a major moving traffic violation that generally consists in driving a vehicle with willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property. It is usually a more serious offense than careless driving, improper driving, or driving without due care and attention and is often punishable by fines, imprisonment, or driver's license suspension or revocation. 
