>>1523825>If they have political or financial voting power, or even just a platform from where they can tout their narrative to others, I'd say it does matter.Edward Snowden once said something like
>when one side of a political debate is censored they are more likely to retreat into the shadows and that will increase the probability of violence but this quote looks like it was memory holed or scrubbed at least with google search listings.. the point though is that people need to be able to express their differences because its at least like a pressure relief valve and its more likely to result in compromise
we cant but bubble wrap over everything because some retards are going to slip and fall and hit their heads.. of course stupid people will fall for scams but its better to allow darwinism to take effect and allow smart people to make up their own damn minds
part of the problem with regulation in the financial industry is that everyone just fucking trusts the regs instead of doing their own research and pretty soon we will see a dollar collapse (just look at the price of gold rn).. in crypto the market is more aware of the scams than the boomer muh 401k tards