>>1528041>how do you feel about traditional gender roles?Traditional gender roles are the cultural fluff around emergent specialisations of purpose a given sex in human animal has to perform.
Men evolved ability to generate excess resources to keep his brood alive - whence come admiarion of self-sufficiency, perserverence and nigh-sucidal psychological drive dowards purpose and goal over safety.
Women are literally a thin wrapper around an uterus, because human larva requires so goddamn much care before its viable and you need to spawn like a five of those to keep your numbers constant - as child mortality was so high.
Each sex is also psychologically driven to feel a deficit of precisely what the other sex provides. Which drives us towards pair bonding in the first place.
Considering that the stakes for veering off this divide were so high ( read: extinction ) every successful society makes sure to make the man-woman pair bond to be as stable as possible and shames everyone veering off their designated purpose. Whence aberrations such as homosex or whatnots were so looked upon.
The west is dying off, because at some point we thought of "equality" - because in our drive to make women happy, we thought that we can quell their deficit of what men provide by making women be "men".
Sorry for blog.
