>>1539111what's wrong with the video? it's obviously not a peer-reviewed scientific article, but it seems reasonable to me, and I work in biotech. I remember first watching it when I got into cycling, and finding it really useful that somebody even bothered to quantify the difference-- the rest of the internet, like the comments in OP, is full of people who insist the difference is so substantial that nobody should bother with them, not even college students cycling between classes <1 mile apart. honestly, I'm surprised to see comments like
>>1539853 which seem to get the details right.
