>>1571812there is literally nothing substantial or damning in that long blog-post and it's from the most biased source imaginable.
The bulk of it is either that he's rude, or that they don't trust him, or that his identity is shadowy.
What his name is, is nothing. Who fucking cares?
If you have a case to make, make it.
And at this point if your case is his name and his motivations, why don't you be transparent about who your horse in this race is?
Me, i have nothing to do with the cycling industry and he's basically never really talked about anything i've owned or own aside from campag and shimano. So basically I just like him because I like his videos. Explain yourself.
and really i already said that didn't I
by:
>but please explain your actual caseI didn't mean please waste my time on a big nothing tldr from some seething engineerlets.
