>>1579078> rides just as well as 27.5" and 29"Never have you been more wrong in your entire life. Do yourself a favour and spend some time riding a 29ner.
>>1579043> t. brain-dead consoomer.Nah, just someone likes bikes that ride well and are designed to get fast.
> while 29 has appeared in the last handful of years at most.29ner appeared in the early 2000s primarily on xc bikes.
> it is outright wasteful on so many counts to replace a bike if you're happy with it and it still works.This is a bit of a catch 22 situation if you are happy with your old bike you will never know how much more happier you could be on a new and better bike. Also, what is wasteful about upgrading?
> it may shock your tiny, american, Yeah, I am Australian. We have absolutely no bike parks and the bike parks we do have are shit. So we just ride up and down our local mountains where the ground is hardpacked with a layer of loose gravel and dust. Also, no one maintains the trails so everything is chewed out.
> grow some leg muscles you lard bucket.With OPs gearing he isn't riding up hills.
