>>1585663>it was heavily implied>Where?do you know what deduction is? the logical process of deduction? from Descartes?
>>1. in 1979 most could fit 30mm>I'd not be so sure about that.You should be. look at them image above
>>2. the rest of your list are good things>No, they are performing way worse than their modern counterparts.no, they worked well together.
>>there was nothing left to improve that was the problem>There was a lot to improve, from shifters over brakes to tires and materials.tires improved. tires aren't bikes. nothing else was improved
>>not to road bikes>Still relevant to cycling.this is still above road bikes, despite your apparent difficulties with reading comprehension
>>they were perfect so they ruined them>They wheren't perfect at all and improved a lot in the last 40 years.They have been ruined over 40 years. they were perfect
>>now it's 2020 and they are not perfect, correct>They never where perfect and never will be perfect.They were perfect and now they are not
