>>1627325>Scientist shows his method of testing, signs his name with the paper and therefore can be easily refuted.
Its only a problem if you're too stupid to show where he's wrong.
>PhD StudentExact same thing, except its already known he's unexperienced therefore more prone to errors. Not a problem because a scientific paper is only considered a fact once tested and confirmed by many other scientists, which like in the case 1, they all can be refuted with data.
>Media ExpertAgree 100%
>Karen on FacebookReposts everything she sees on the internet, doesn't cares about facts.
We (4chan) made she fry her iPhone 6 because we created fake posts saying iPhones can be charged on the microwave oven.
We made her daughter shave her hair because we created fake posts saying Justin Bieber got cancer.
We made the world believe Pepe the frog and the OK sign to be white supremacy symbols.
And she (you) never, ever learns. Lurk more, 2016 election newfag.
