>>1686262I'd like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as a cycling girlfriend, is in fact, just a female who picked up a "hobby" from one of the previous guys who fucked her, or as I've recently taken to calling them, thots. A thot is not a person who likes cycling for its own sake, but rather another way to make herself seem more desirable to men by making herself appear to enjoy things like exercise, being outdoors, a sense of friendly competition or just being alone with one's thoughts, plus the sense of pride in maintaining a fine machine tuned to one's own particular wants and requirements.
Many men have been tricked into letting women intrude on, and therefore defile their most cherished personal pursuits, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the world of cycling has become ruined by "inclusiveness" virtue signaling, and rather than having an opportunity to mentor a new cyclist (who happens to have breasts and a vagina) in their discovery of a new hobby. normal male cyclists find themselves berated out of nowhere by these thots because they enjoy bicycles "too much" and that makes them "elitist" or "toxic masculinity".
There really are female cyclists, and some of them have boyfriends, but they are about 1 in 1,000,000 and despite the fact that this implies that thousands of them probably exist SOMEWHERE, in fact you will never actually meet one. Cycling is the sport or practice of riding a bicycle, having a bicycle is an essential part of being a cyclist but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a pure desire to ride. "Women's cycling" is normally used in combination with an ulterior motive: the intent is to make it something vulgar and inane: "this is not a race". All the so-called "women's bicycles" are really just normal bicycles painted pink.
