>>1691745>Yes...so are you going to explain what's inaccurate about it?
>>1691739>This is really only beneficial for commuter/medium distance trains....except I literally explained why Thameslink, for example, use 12-car trains, the longest trainsets that run in GB; because people on the route won't benefit from frequent service in the mornings, they'll benefit from getting into central London in good time for their office job.
>you'd want long distance trains to have longer dwell times due to more passengers getting on/off the train....and this makes no sense. A short trainset will have shorter dwell times than a long trainset because the shorter trainset will have fewer passengers to embark/disembark.
Like I'm not specifically arguing for or against something ffs. I'm simply explaining an advantage that short sets have over long sets