>>1707425>a problem of perspectiveyes, after a few hundred bikes one gets used to what an average bike feels like
and can start to notice the smaller details that make some bikes stand out
very slight variations in frame geometry are better suited to the differing proportions of human body's
a bike that suits one persons centre of mass may not suit another persons
engineering wise the sub 300 $ bike leaves something to be desired
the older BSO made between 1960s and 1970s have alto more character and generally better ergonomics
1930s and older bikes are comfie to ride but super whipy and flexible, almost comical
a bike with an MSRP of around 500 to 1000 $ when new seems to have a lot more care put into its specifications
but I have not noticed anything particularly amazing about the 3000 to 8000 $ bikes, the gains and specialisations get so small they become situational
