/n/ - Transportation » Thread #1743069

[82 / 8 / ?]

30KiB, 1280x298, Boeing_full_logo.svg.png

Good riddance

Anonymous Thu 16 Dec 2021 18:16:44 No.1743069 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>1743070 >>1743288 >>1743318 >>1744485 >>1744545 >>1745925 >>1746454 >>1749402 >>1749432 >>1749672 >>1750319 >>1751321

Boeing : 1916-2021

Lost to Airbus on the Qantas deal : https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/airbus-wins-order-renew-qantas-fleet-sources-2021-12-15/

Not a single Boeing will be ordered

And now they lost the KLM deal too : https://mobile.twitter.com/AirFranceKLM/status/1471529414978588672?s=20

Not a single Boeing ordered too

Good riddance Boeing, keep riding at full speed on the same highway to hell that McDonnell Douglas took a few decades ago

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 Dec 2021 18:18:00 No.1743070 Report

Quoted By: >>1743081 >>1744544 >>1751321

>>1743069
Mark my words : either Ryanair or Southwest (or even both) is going to turn their back to Boeing and order A220/320/321

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 Dec 2021 19:22:49 No.1743080 Report

Quoted By: >>1745200

BUT THE MAX IS SAFE
IT IS SAFEEEEEEEE

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 Dec 2021 19:26:10 No.1743081 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743070
>Mark my words : either Ryanair or Southwest (or even both) is going to turn their back to Boeing and order A220/320/321
They aren't going to wait years for delivery. If anything, they can negotiate a better unit price.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 Dec 2021 22:49:33 No.1743120 Report

Quoted By: >>1743133 >>1743207

Boeing only dies when US carriers drop them, which won't happen for at least 20 years. But it'll be interesting to see what happens as the management slowly realizes this, and splits the firm between Boeing Defense and Boeing Commercial. Moreso than present of course. I can only think of a similar circumstance happening with HP/HPE and Ford/Sterling.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 00:44:46 No.1743133 Report

Quoted By: >>1743171 >>1743228 >>1751321

>>1743120
>Boeing only dies when US carriers drop them
Boeing will die as soon as Southwest is going to drop them : all US major airlines are using more Airbus airframes than Boeing ones.
Besides, almost all airlines that used to be exclusive customers of Douglas/Boeing are now at least 50% composed of Airbus
For fucks sake, even Alaska Airlines who used to be "Proudly all Boeing" is flying Airbus and Bombardier airframes

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 02:03:50 No.1743171 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743133
I hope it implodes, their homosexual management lose their jobs and the subsidiaries, employees, ... work in real stuff somehow.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 05:00:17 No.1743204 Report

Quoted By: >>1743205 >>1743243 >>1751566 >>1752723 >>1753027

so what are the chance of Embraer or Bombardier replacing Boeing place as competitors to Airbus?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 05:09:00 No.1743205 Report

Quoted By: >>1743207

>>1743204
>so what are the chance of Embraer or Bombardier replacing Boeing place
Zero, they're niche aircraft manufacturers, specialized in bizjets and regional jets (which are very good, reliable and proven by the way).
They don't have the experience and the infrastructures to produce large planes in bulk volumes and the ability to switch their productions lines

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 05:18:57 No.1743207 Report

Quoted By: >>1743208

>>1743205
What if they bought a a split Boeing eg like >>1743120 said?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 05:21:46 No.1743208 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743207
Well, in this scenario, it might be feasible.
Of course, they'll need to get rid of all the disastrous management and plagued methods of working in order to be able to be competitive and effective mid and long haul aircraft manufacturers

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 07:49:32 No.1743228 Report

Quoted By: >>1749419

>>1743133
Alaska's always had Dash-8s/Q400s flying with Horizon, they just stopped Horizon's branded flying because apparently people are weird like that (they also got rid of Jones Soda, because people are dumb and prefer Coke). The Airbuses came from Virgin.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 10:06:31 No.1743243 Report

Quoted By: >>1743263 >>1743276 >>1744400 >>1745934

>>1743204
Bombardier tried, but in that market you need a massive global sales and support network to succeed, and since they didn't have that, they had to sell their product line to Airbus for peanuts. Airbus renamed the planes to the A220, and have been enormously successful. COMAC desperately wants to be the next big civil aviation company, but that depends entirely on how much grip China has on the rest of the world's balls and whether they want to use that grip to sell airplanes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 14:41:50 No.1743263 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743243
NEVER FLYING OR RIDING CHINKSHIT

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 15:54:28 No.1743276 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743243
I'd rather fly Boeing than chink planes. Holy fuck please no

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 17:36:15 No.1743288 Report

Quoted By: >>1743293 >>1744531

>>1743069
Lockheed needs to make a comeback in the commercial sector. Now would be the perfect time

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 17:53:46 No.1743293 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743288
No. Now would be the worst time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 21:31:48 No.1743314 Report

Quoted By:

Boeing won't die. If it comes to that, Airbus itself will buy their planes so as to avoid antitrust laws.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO boeing shit4.jpg, 3MiB, 2448x3823

Anonymous Fri 17 Dec 2021 22:20:15 No.1743318 Report

Quoted By: >>1743415 >>1745201 >>1749392

>>1743069
Hiring those untrained codemonkeys really saved them a ton of money didn't it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 04:41:54 No.1743415 Report

Quoted By: >>1743421 >>1745936

>>1743318
I am heartbroken that the management threw away their reason for profits.

It just shows that when you play with fire you get burned. They had many opportunities to shape the market, but never took them instead focused on what they believed would make money. Even today I hear that all they care about is their stock price.

Sad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 05:21:20 No.1743421 Report

Quoted By: >>1743453

>>1743415
>McD torpedoes its company over DC10 door with 'muh gentleman's agreement' to hide a dumb design decision
>gets bought by Boeing
>takes over management
>torpedoes Boeing the exact same way with the MAX

top kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 09:04:50 No.1743453 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743421
That Dc-10 door thing today would have made those decision makers see the inside of a congressional hearing ala Forkner, but nothing is going to come of that either. Always its the victims that are the Real losers. Boeing can change it smanagement. Build a new business and change. But you can't bring back the dead.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Dec 2021 17:49:41 No.1744400 Report

Quoted By: >>1746927

>>1743243
>COMAC
Great name, instantly makes me think of a Chinese gigacorporation run by the PRC government that makes half assed copies of western technology for half the price and half the reliability. I can imagine the name "COMAC" with a PRC flag next to it on a piece of cheap cracked plastic at the bottom of an ocean, corners getting engulfed by algae.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Dec 2021 23:51:34 No.1744485 Report

Quoted By: >>1744489 >>1744744

>>1743069
>Lost to Airbus on the Qantas deal : https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/airbus-wins-order-renew-qantas-fleet-sources-2021-12-15/
Nice.
>The Australian national airline said it had committed to buying 20 Airbus A321XLR planes and 20 A220-300 jets
A321XLR for domestic routes? That is bit odd.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 00:13:17 No.1744489 Report

Quoted By: >>1744491

>>1744485
Makes sense, not to big, long range, considering Australia have inhabited coastal lines only, more or less, so it can fly from one edge of continent to another. Sort of long range flying buss. Cramped, can go from one part to another. There will be not to much people flying it. Also Boeing have nothing to other in this category. In short it looks as good choice in the new shitty world where travels is cripled by cividiocy nonsense. Also they get rid of bars and other luxury stuff for first class, so it's simple but effective flying bus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 00:39:01 No.1744491 Report

Quoted By: >>1744494

>>1744489
They are replacing 737-800 with it. A321 LR and XLR have substantially longer range. Especially XLR is more or less aimed to be 757 replacement as intercontinental capable narrow body. A321Neo without extra fuel tanks of LR and XLR is more or less 737-800 with lower operating costs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 00:58:03 No.1744494 Report

Quoted By: >>1744578

>>1744491
scrapping the 757 was such a fucking stupid move.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 04:37:43 No.1744531 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743288
Lockheed's execs are smart enough to know that it's not worth it when they are making money hand over fist in defense. There's not much room in the airliner market for them to exploit - A320 serves the narrow body segment well, 787 and A350 cover widebodies, and A220 and E2 cover smaller narrowbodies. There's no real demand for anything larger than an 777 or smaller than an E2 so where would Lockheed fit in?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 05:50:55 No.1744544 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743070
This absolutely isn't going to happen. They have both recently placed additional 737 orders.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 05:53:14 No.1744545 Report

Quoted By: >>1749489

>>1743069
Fucking delusional. The 737Max, even with a ton of cancellations in the last couple years, is still by far Boeing's best and fastest selling aircraft. Boeing also has a larger market share for wide bodies and absolutely dominates freighters (90%+). They also have a much bigger military business than Airbus.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 68e.png, 220KiB, 500x635

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 11:10:38 No.1744578 Report

Quoted By: >>1746860

>>1744494
Thanks for the reminder that the 757 is not in production anymore

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 22:57:44 No.1744716 Report

Quoted By: >>1744729 >>1751321

Another success for Boeing : Turkish Airlines has canceled their option for 40 Boeing 737 MAX
And there's rumors that Turkish Airlines low cost subsidiary, AnadoluJet, will transition to a all-Airbus fleet of A320/A321

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Dec 2021 23:36:26 No.1744729 Report

Quoted By: >>1744743

>>1744716
Someone on airliners.net suggested that Boeing is losing orders on purpose so they can make more money from more profitable customers like Ryanair

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Dec 2021 01:32:33 No.1744743 Report

Quoted By:

>>1744729
Jesus Christ, single digit IQ strategy

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Dec 2021 01:36:16 No.1744744 Report

Quoted By: >>1746041

>>1744485
A321XLR could be used for international flights to secondary cities in China, Japan, and S. Korea.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Dec 2021 06:58:10 No.1745200 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743080
Safe and effective?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Dec 2021 07:00:37 No.1745201 Report

Quoted By: >>1746531

>>1743318
"Perfectly imperfect" Boeing is a literal terrorist org now. Max was no accident.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO i maek plen.png, 117KiB, 500x584

Anonymous Tue 28 Dec 2021 22:02:46 No.1745925 Report

Quoted By: >>1753157

>>1743069

Should Boeing unironically partner with [spoiler:lit]Mitsubishi[/spoiler:lit] at this point?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Dec 2021 23:55:12 No.1745934 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743243
fuck that, they can use them on their own chinkshit airlines.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Dec 2021 23:59:14 No.1745936 Report

Quoted By: >>1746030 >>1746473

>>1743415
You play with fire and get burned with transportation, especially aviation. They tried to use the same business model that is used to make shit like iPods, TVs, fridges, etc. If your smart fridge has a bug, you just get it replaced. But if the 737 max has a bug because Aditi and Vishnakamurthi didn't think about what happens if one of the AoA sensors fails, it can't just be replaced.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Dec 2021 13:52:12 No.1746030 Report

Quoted By:

>>1745936
That isn't any reassurance, not that it would help. I'm of the opinion that their top down style is and has gone universal. Everyone looks across the pond and says Airbus is immune to this shit. MARK MY WORDS HERE. They're just as susceptible, if not more so. We're not dealing with a few bad apples in Washington state or Darth Vader's sabotage squad, we are dealing with rotten culture and rotten values.

Forkner is just the tip of the iceberg. What about the department that hired him. His boss. Who was his oversight. His colleagues that didn't sound the alarm, Those emails and the things are in them, the SHTF and then the scapegoating and blame games begin.

When the lid is lifted all the cockroaches go running.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Dec 2021 14:57:23 No.1746041 Report

Quoted By:

>>1744744
Makes sense since AU is overrun with bugpeople now.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot from 2021-12-31 10-33 (...).png, 120KiB, 896x639

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 09:35:26 No.1746454 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743069
>another 60 Airbus planes ordered

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 10:36:02 No.1746467 Report

Quoted By: >>1746468 >>1746520 >>1746522

Boeing's biggest issue might be that they aren't capable of designing new aircraft. If they've eagerly been firing experienced engineers who know how to design a new plane, they may not have the intitutional knowledge to create anything new.
Boeing needs to make a clean sheet as soon as possible. Even if they don't need it, they need to learn how to design airplanes. The fired engineers are still alive, so Boeing should hire them back at a high cost and use one of the last opportunities to relearn how to design planes. In 15 years it might be too late, there may be no people left who remember how to design new planes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 10:39:58 No.1746468 Report

Quoted By: >>1746482 >>1746520

>>1746467
>they may not have the intitutional knowledge to create anything new.
787

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 11:38:48 No.1746473 Report

Quoted By: >>1746520

>>1745936
they did think about it, but product management made the fix DLC. Unfortunately the trend is going to get far worse. There's no way to avert technoslavery other than return to monke

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 12:41:48 No.1746482 Report

Quoted By: >>1746520

>>1746468
That's not new lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 17:19:39 No.1746520 Report

Quoted By:

>>1746482
>>1746473
>>1746468
>>1746467

Whatever that has been innovated so far does not need to be reinvented.

If they really want to upstage Airbus, they need to change the rules of the game. The market is fragmenting. Maybe that is a pointer they should pick up on. All they need are some smart guys, a room , some jeppesen charts and 24 hour security. You can't leave until you have an answer. Works every time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 17:24:06 No.1746522 Report

Quoted By:

>>1746467
just start building B29s again but with modern High bypass turbo fan engines

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 31 Dec 2021 18:40:54 No.1746531 Report

Quoted By:

>>1745201
>"There are no trivialities in aviation"<

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 01 Jan 2022 21:30:58 No.1746860 Report

Quoted By:

>>1744578
boeing also handicapped the 748s sales with an abysmal sales team.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 00:47:41 No.1746927 Report

Quoted By:

>>1744400
>I can imagine the name "COMAC" with a PRC flag next to it on a piece of cheap cracked plastic at the bottom of an ocean, corners getting engulfed by algae.
Would be incredibly based

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 596KiB, 760x506

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 00:13:05 No.1749378 Report

Quoted By:

DISREGARD BOEING
ADQUIRE EMBRAER

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 00:36:05 No.1749388 Report

Quoted By: >>1749399

I mostly fly regional like 787s not international but 787 beats the hell out of a320

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 00:50:29 No.1749392 Report

Quoted By: >>1749397

>>1743318
It's not Boeing that required the change to happen, that was arbitrary FAA rules, and you know it was some white middle management idiot who made the decision to add the shitty software patch.....

At the end if the day it was thirdy pilots who fucked up too, it's more than 75% on them and their aftermarket sensors

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 01:02:29 No.1749397 Report

Quoted By:

>>1749392
T. Boeing

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 01:07:15 No.1749399 Report

Quoted By: >>1749483 >>1749594

The Airline industry will change dramatically as a result of decarbonisation.
There will be two options: carbon neutral kerosene or hydrogen.
Both of these will dramatically increase the cost to fly, in areas with High speed rail, or potentially even intercity speed rail, flying will become uncompetitive.
The requirements are going to be shifted even more towards ultra high efficiency, long range and low volume.
On the one hand this will likely destroy much of the airline industry, on the other we may actually see some genuinely out of the box and innovative design, stuff like BWB might actually become worth it.

There is opportunity for Boeing to start from scratch there, either that or they go down like Kodak.

>>1749388
You are comparing a sedan to a hatchback.
The A350 is the 787 competitor.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 50...png, 249KiB, 866x831

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 01:10:36 No.1749402 Report

Quoted By: >>1749408

>>1743069
Uh-huh.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 01:41:53 No.1749408 Report

Quoted By:

>>1749402
>buying unused inventory at cost
That’s a smart play.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 02:36:25 No.1749419 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743228
The first horizon plane I was one was a Fokker F27, they were still using the plane in 2005 when it was 50 years old. They stopped using it at some point after that but i don't know when

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 04:34:38 No.1749432 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743069
Fuck yes
Fuck Boeing
Fuck their management
Fuck JEWS
and Fuck jannies

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 10:50:35 No.1749483 Report

Quoted By: >>1749886

>>1749399
a350 then either way the Airbus offering is always rough as guts

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 11:07:43 No.1749489 Report

Quoted By:

>>1744545
>absolutely dominates freighters (90%+)
Their hugeass headstart is a factor. Airbus only started being a thing circa the late-80s.
Since a lot of cargo planes are old refitted liners, Boeing has the advantage of several decades' worth of being the biggest (sometimes only, after Locksneed got out of civvie planes, and MD getting fused) kid on the block.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 17:15:00 No.1749594 Report

Quoted By:

>>1749399
WTF KIND OF BULLSHIT IS THIS. ITS NOT GREEN so legislate it out of FUCKING EXISTANCE.

SCREW THE OTHER BENEFITS, AND RAISE THE COSTS FOR EVERYONE, Utter TOTAL SHIT.

Do you Agree with this garbage? How can you stand by and let politicians and lesgislators tell the industry what to do with emmisions? The requirements do not help anyone, and are probably written by someone with ZERO practical experience in the industry to begin with.

If you want fuel efficiency, modern engines are good enough. If they want their Carbon Zero, go call Greta Thunberg.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 09 Jan 2022 22:15:08 No.1749672 Report

Quoted By: >>1749784

>>1743069
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/boeing-rings-up-3-orders-as-calendar-flips-to-2022/ar-AASAGA6?ocid=msedgntp

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Jan 2022 03:22:59 No.1749784 Report

Quoted By:

>>1749672
Yeah you read it right there, New emissions standards that will force them to close down production lines. Trump was right. Screw the Paris accord. These goals are unrealistic and damaging to the industry, but does Biden do anything... only crickets....

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Jan 2022 10:32:04 No.1749886 Report

Quoted By:

>>1749483
Airbus is being sued over their A350s being made from cheap materials

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Jan 2022 08:36:34 No.1750319 Report

Quoted By: >>1751192

>>1743069
The American government will just prop it up. Free-market capitalism doesn't apply to massive corporations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Jan 2022 14:53:52 No.1751192 Report

Quoted By: >>1751198

>>1750319
Please describe how the American Government does what you claim.

And you said free market capitalism doesn't apply to large corporations. Please cite an example. Choose any American corporation that is 100 percent State sponsored and massively known Worldwide for their abundant receipts of US Government handouts, doesn't produce anything and is just straight up overblown.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Jan 2022 15:21:27 No.1751198 Report

Quoted By: >>1751202

>>1751192
your retarded overlord elon musk gets shit loads in subsidies and pretends he doesn't

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Jan 2022 15:35:44 No.1751202 Report

Quoted By: >>1751203

>>1751198
WRONG ANSWER,

Elon Musk owns a factory and produces something. That thing might be retarded, but it is sold on the market. Try Again.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Jan 2022 15:36:44 No.1751203 Report

Quoted By: >>1751206

>>1751202
>What are EV tax credits?
>What are carbon credits?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Jan 2022 15:44:12 No.1751206 Report

Quoted By: >>1751213

>>1751203
Read the question properly dude, The company must not produce anything, Nada, Nothing, Zip.

That example is not State owned and cannot be propped up by both the means you cite. They moved out of Cali to TX, to reduce the Government interference with their business, making the chance that they may or may not be propped up much less.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Jan 2022 16:08:32 No.1751213 Report

Quoted By:

>>1751206
mod detected

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Jan 2022 22:37:34 No.1751321 Report

Quoted By: >>1751564 >>1752759

>>1743069
>Boeing : 1916-2021
>>1743070
>words : either
>>1743133
>them : all
>>1744716
>Boeing : Turkish

Hey, anon, here's a tip: In English, you aren't supposed to put a space before a colon. It's a dead giveaway for your ESL-hood.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Jan 2022 13:41:46 No.1751564 Report

Quoted By:

>>1751321
There are genuine gripes about the Boeing Company, and then there is the straight up bullpoop.

If you are into the latter, choose your brand, either it be wrapped with something that has a competitors logo, has something to do with electrified rails or is Non Carbonated.

Whatever it is, kindly put your wrapper in the bin by the door on your way out.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Jan 2022 13:50:43 No.1751566 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743204
C-Series killed Bombardier and they were forced to sell off everything but their business jet program. They sold off Dash 8 and the rest of their share of the A220 program. Train division gone too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Jan 2022 05:19:59 No.1752723 Report

Quoted By:

>>1743204
Bombardier is out of the industry now, apart from private jets.

Embraer is not going to challenge anytime soon. The E2 isn't a strong seller and their next project looks like it'll be a regional turboprop. They aren't trying to take on Boeing and Airbus directly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Jan 2022 09:10:41 No.1752759 Report

Quoted By:

>>1751321
anon, you are sharing this site with thousands of foreigners
we're not trying to hide it

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Jan 2022 22:41:33 No.1753027 Report

Quoted By: >>1753138

>>1743204
More like COMAC, after making russian UAC their bitches.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Jan 2022 04:48:30 No.1753138 Report

Quoted By:

>>1753027
Never happen, at least not in the near term. The Chinese don't have the network to push China's Aerospace products abroad like the the Canadians or Brazilians. Their 929 promises much, but the specification needs to be pragmatically arrived at from More R&D and testing, which apart from money costs time. So far their 919 is going slowly, and with this pandemic, the impact will be measured in years. IMO China can kiss the worldwide aerospace market goodbye.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 51OXBS5AEcL._SX342_SY445_QL70_ML2_.jpg, 23KiB, 327x445

Anonymous Tue 18 Jan 2022 06:22:37 No.1753157 Report

Quoted By:

>>1745925
want
need some 1980s Japan fear mongering again

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Good riddance