>>1784067>PrivateShow me a private contract where they have to bus 100, a 1000 buses for a a manufactuer
>municipalIsnt that what we are talking about?
>peopleAs in corporations are people?
>pinchingin which example? If you mean in the production of the buses, yes, to fatten the margins. If you mean on the city council side: god no. Just look at how so many cities ate up the electric scooter scam. Democrats love nothing more than wasting money, after all its not theirs, in their fantasies it never comes from working people, only old rich white men who need to be punished anyway. Making lousy deals is either corruption, ineptitude or a bizarre wealth redistribution tactic.
>>1784072Not him, but you dont seem to understand the discoruse in the states is a aribtraty stopping point. Americans love the abject communism of the highway, cause its allows them to waste more resources then in all of human history. There is no money in it. Quite the opposite, its a black hole of the wealthiest segment of the public, who needs no help, drafting EVERYONE, especially the very poor, to co-pay for their misadventures in the countryside, so they can have a house next to a tree: "the american dream" Its a dream alright. A nightmare for everyone with a brain, though.
>>1784075Not him, but if the subsidy is there, and the fare is joke, what does it matter? 1$ ride all day isn't charity, its cities trying to get people to use the damn thing to get any value out of it. The irony is the more suburbanites get these handouts, it undermines the buses user base, decentralizes populations so the bus can't even work as a system in the first place, then they use that a ammo that "buses don't work".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeIWhatever you think of this smug faggot, you cant say much against his points.
>>1784078I guess in the strictest sense....where are this Starcraft van, non-profit taxis you speak of?
