(cont.)
>>1839239>why are there separate 2-person and 4-person pods?Just to have a "small" (individual commuter) and "large" (group travel) option. Perhaps 2 and 6 would be better. Larger parties could simply book several cars, similar to how you might need 2-3 coach buses to move them long distance.
>why not use a single standard design across the fleet, to simplify maintenanceBecause only 2-person cars would restrict group travel, and only 6-person cars would cause a loss of efficiency for single-person trips. Having the two options allows an individual to cheaply book a car to himself for his trip, while also allowing mid-sized parties to travel in the same car.
>why is it powered by a pantograph and not a third rail?Pantograph looked cooler in the picture. A third rail would work just as well. Don't think there's much cost/maintenance difference, other than perhaps wire damage in storms.
>when will the interiors be cleaned, and by whom?A "maintenance required" button will be placed on the car's console, when pressed it will pilot the car to a maintenance/cleaning siding automatically after it's next stop. Station staff there will be able to clean the car the way any transit is cleaned, and then send it back out into service.
>why is a 'variety of plans' needed for a brand-new captive system?Some people may wish to get an annual pass for unlimited rides, while others may only need a day pass or a single trip. This is fairly common on light rail systems.
>>1839243>why travel at 30-40mph specifically?The intention is to out-speed traditional transportation methods without having to hit highway speeds. It's not any faster than an average tram, but by not making constant stops and spending large amounts of time accelerating and decelerating, it averages a much higher trip speed.
