>>1860020>ok dude ill just take your word for itAlright let me put it this way.. if you commute to your place of business and also place of recreation then that physical distance beets trying to blend into a crowd even though youre sitting across the same people on the metro all the time. Shit where you eat blah blah blah.
>muh slippery slope is a fallacyIt is not. As proven time again, with COVID, gun control, the war on terror, surveillance. Death by a thousand cuts, and the boiling frog strategy are real, and those think tanks even admit it. That's why they are classifying ar-15s as a "public health crisis" because they literally said they want to use the same strategy as anti-smoking where they just make it a really fucking inconvenient to smoke through new laws all time. And they are doing this exact fucking bullshit to cars, and owning a small business, and whatever else good and free in this world.
And reduction to absurdity in this case was not a slippery slop argument. I was saying using the same logic as houses are inefficient and apartments are efficient we could surmise it would be more efficient to hot swap our beds or sleep next to randomly assigned strangers to increase efficiency! I wasn't implying it will actually go that far, except for the pod shit tested out for milleniels on welfare or something.
>Energy prices being dependent of global financial markets are a plague.It's cartelized psuedo-markets. It would be nice if we could harvest green goo for energy though!
>Privatized for profit housing marketProperty rights can be negotiated in creative ways.. too lazy to list but it's better to reach a compromise without relying on big government.
>suburbia shit is not an answer.It's better than cramming people into commie blocks (unless theyre really poor but even then roommates are better.) This has to do with cars affording some political agency to individuals and the access to distribution methods outside of delivery.
