>>1892307There have been several instances of railbanked trails being reactivated (don't remember where offhand) but I think the point you're making is valid and should be considered. Once people get used to a trail in their community (and no trains anymore), they're not going to give that up so quickly. Any railroad should expect some pushback and be ready to bargain.
The railroad could offer a compromise where the ROW carries a rail line and a path, but that will create problems. The ROW easement/property itself might be too narrow for both. If it's not then the railroad will always be fighting a battle to keep people off of its tracks, even with fences, opening themselves up to liability and possibly reducing access to the track for maintenance. In urbanized areas both will probably be significant problems.
