>>2001954>>2001954 didn't disparage any lycrafags, i dont even feel strongly about it. you like to go fast, you ride often, and you don't want to be wearing soaking wet cotton. seems totally logical to me. i gave a dispassionate answer to the OPs question, and you guys are butthurt that my comment wasnt "YEAH WERE AWESOME AND EVERYONE ELSE SUCKS"...
>>20019481. yes. what's the difference?
2. when i said that normies dislike you because they're inconvencined, not because of their jealously that they're too fat or lazy to wear bibs and ride a roadbike, or whatever. i loosely implied you have a persecution complex
3. you asked me personally, and i'm not against roadbike lycra gelpack eater types. do whatever makes you happy.
>>2001944>Wtf does that mean? We're not forcing you to be hardcore, what are you angry about here? Unless there are cyclists pressuring/terrorizing you to ride only for performance you have no right to be mad because of how they like to cycleI said the average person, having never donned a special outfit or purchased 4,000 dollars worth of gear, to go on a bike ride, sees you guys as absurd.
>HES TROLLING>HES A TROLL>HE HAS NOTHING SUBSTANTIVE TO SAYchill out. i see why people don't like you cocky retarded bastards. absolutely insufferable. i watch and enjoy all kinds of competitive cycling, and enjoy goofy shit like track sprints and stuff. i'm not anti-lycrafag at all. but i fear if i actually converse with many more of you faggots i will be.
