>>2004977Are you really that dense ? I will repeat my request. Please show me, where I
>>2004379 have made any call for legislation regarding the matter or alternative means of enforcing choices.
Please be precise and provide a quote.
Hint: Impossible. Since I have not and I do not condone any sort of authority including legislation.
I have a creeping suspicion (you)
>>2004977 are a voter. Have you ever voted in a democratic state / government election ? If so I think your insinuation of untrue facts about others is not only wrong but unfortunate in a very ironic way.
Little hint in case you are really that dense do not understand: I oppose all laws regarding anyones choice of mode of transportation. This includes all design aspects of the vehicle and the mode of operation, like speed, mandates to stop or give way etc.
At the same time I believe any righteous man, especially the healthy mature male able bodied individual, should refuse to make use of any means of motorized transportation.
But all that is tangential at best. You are making false claims about my contribution and you have failed and probably will fail again to back it up via quote.
