>>2022428Same and I unironically hate democracy and think the government's only incomes should be tarrifs
But bicycles are fucking gay and lame. Yes it's a fact that most truggers are doing it feel masculine but blind reaction against that for bicycles is both pathetic and buys the truggers' idea of reflecting masculinity (or lack thereof) in car sizes, making this reactonary cycling gay.
Best motoring culture: moderate sized cars. Australian sedans were great for this for many years, you had Falcons and Commodores, and both were medium-large sedans, rear wheel drive, fairly powerful engines for towing, and they tried to be sporty for what they were, family sedans. Big natty engines are lazy and live forever, too. Imagine how much money everybody could save if it were normal to keep a car for 60 years
.
Meanwhile, have you failed to notice the communism of cycling and public transport? One is directly controlled and run by government; one is just very slow. Neither allow the freedom that cars do to citizens, of fast independent movement whenever and where-ever they want. Cars can even haul half a ton of your shit therewith.
There is one form of transport that isn't cars, scores very well on freedom, is practical, and yet the urbanist cycle-bus tards never speak of it. Motorcycles. Why? Simple, motorcycle don't need jack shit politically to work on car infrastructure. They fill at the same pumps and park in the same spots. However, if urbanists really wanted to achieve what they say they do, they would shill motorcycles. But that destroys their claim on political power for being too easy. Therefore, it is FOR POWER, and transport is the necessary excuse for communists in government to regulate and control people. The faggots who are 28 and never yet had a driver's license are their useful idiots.
