>>2025618Because it's not. You judge the value based on the prices around you. But you don't take into account that wages in Russia are not the same as in the us. And Omsk is literally a poor shithole of a village, where 300 dollars is considered a good salary. Accordingly, the cost of construction is tens of times cheaper. Builders, intermediaries, engineers, logistics - everything is cheaper. Then you don't take into account the investment attractiveness - this hole requires very expensive maintenance, and it will be very far from possible to START monetizing it. At the moment, prices in Russia have increased several times, purchasing power has decreased - most people spend money only on the most necessary things. So they will not sell it at market value, but at cost price in the best case, or even lower.
This anon (
>>2025935 ) is almost right. The only difference is that most likely no one would even pay these 2.5 million. If this property was of any value to oligarchs, it would be given away for free to the needed person. Usually it looks like this - a special bank would give the right person a loan of these 2.5 million to buy the metro with a deposit of 100 dollars. That's all. But this station is of no use to anyone, so anyone can buy it.
