/n/ - Transportation » Thread #2027142

[40 / 3 / 1]

410KiB, 2064x1275, IMG_9579.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 05 Dec 2024 20:38:31 No.2027142 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>2027169 >>2027181 >>2027183 >>2027217 >>2027275 >>2027334 >>2027371 >>2028843 >>2029068

American high-speed rail map from transportation researcher Alon Levy.

Which line would you build first?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 05 Dec 2024 20:43:41 No.2027144 Report

Quoted By:

>transit guru
>Levy
Just say communist.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20241205_171729_X.jpg, 456KiB, 965x944

Anonymous Thu 05 Dec 2024 23:18:25 No.2027150 Report

Quoted By:

>this is the "man" countless /n/iggers look up to
Yikeroni and cheese batman....

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 05 Dec 2024 23:20:44 No.2027151 Report

Quoted By: >>2027160

Isn't this the eugenics freak who hates ADA rules and wanted to delete all the bus stops because they're only needed by disgusting old geezers, and his brilliant plan for making transportation great again was to just drive empty buses around all day?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 02:15:52 No.2027160 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027151
Don’t forget your meds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 02:43:26 No.2027166 Report

Quoted By:

Chicago-Indianapolis because you can use that to connect to a ton of nearby cities.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 04:15:12 No.2027169 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027142
Starting to build a public transport from HSR is like starting to build a house from the chimney.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 15:41:47 No.2027181 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027142
Let me guess, he lives in Chicago?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 15:58:42 No.2027183 Report

Quoted By: >>2027199 >>2027203

>>2027142
LA-Phoenix because >existing trackage between the two

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 21:16:53 No.2027199 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027183
I like that idea, they’re both big and growing cities. Plus tons of people in one city have friends/relatives in the other.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 21:48:21 No.2027203 Report

Quoted By: >>2027208

>>2027183
Existing trackage doesn't mean 1) it's conducive to high speed operations and 2) the railroad that owns it will let you use it. Please think critically

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 23:30:14 No.2027208 Report

Quoted By: >>2027209

>>2027203
>the railroad that owns it will let you use it.
If it's by Amtrak, it has to. So many people here have no idea how railroads work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 23:46:39 No.2027209 Report

Quoted By: >>2027210

>>2027208
Now look up where Amtrak owns the rails.
>So many people here have no idea how railroads work.
jej

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 23:48:51 No.2027210 Report

Quoted By: >>2027212

>>2027209
You are completely retarded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 23:55:02 No.2027212 Report

Quoted By: >>2027213

>>2027210
I accept your concession.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 00:02:14 No.2027213 Report

Quoted By: >>2027216

>>2027212
If Amtrak runs the service, then railroads have to let them use their track, providing they, or their predecessor, were part of the formation of Amtrak in 1970.

You are retarded. Please stop posting here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 00:48:40 No.2027216 Report

Quoted By: >>2027218

>>2027213
That' a gross oversimplification of the situation. Freight railroads can keep new Amtrak routes off their lines indefinitely. And you're still ignoring any track geometry and junctions that don't permit high speed operations. Amtrak can't even get it own tracks upgraded to true HSR.

Keep trying baby bro

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 00:58:36 No.2027217 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027142
SE then NE and the project would die five days later

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 01:03:16 No.2027218 Report

Quoted By: >>2027220 >>2027221

>>2027216
>Freight railroads can keep new Amtrak routes off their lines indefinitely.
No they can't. Again, you people have no idea how railroads work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 01:21:54 No.2027220 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027218
>No they can't.
Yes they can. Carriers can dig in their heels and stonewall Amtrak until it gives up. An arbitration board can rule in the freight carrier's favor. Lobbying can keep Amtrak at bay indefinitely. Learn to think complexly instead of just skimming Wikipedia articles.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 01:23:29 No.2027221 Report

Quoted By: >>2027223 >>2027224

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 01:36:01 No.2027223 Report

Quoted By: >>2027224

>>2027221
They have to allow Amtrak to run. That's the end of it. They can complain and say that Amtrak needs to pay for upgrades to make it viable, or argue about what rates they should have to pay, but that's really it.

The last fight that popped up was CSX fighting Amtrak about restoring service to Mobile, AL but look what happened...
https://www.progressiverailroading.com/railPrime/details/STB-to-Amtrak-When-will-Gulf-Coast-service-roll-out--71278

You have shit for brains, commie faggot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 01:53:19 No.2027224 Report

Quoted By: >>2027225

>>2027223
>They have to allow Amtrak to run. That's the end of it.
Incorrect. See: >>2027221

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 02:02:08 No.2027225 Report

Quoted By: >>2027226

>>2027224
You gave your narrative and I showed you how it worked out. They stalled for a year, gave up, and Amtrak is building the station and getting to run the trains.

You're a real dumb cock sucker, you know that? You come here acting like you know it all, but you really don't have a clue.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 02:04:36 No.2027226 Report

Quoted By: >>2027227

>>2027225
>Sample size = 1
I accept your concession.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 02:13:09 No.2027227 Report

Quoted By: >>2027229

>>2027226
>Your sources: My imagination
Kill yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 02:19:56 No.2027229 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027227
Your concession has already been accepted. There is no need to continue losing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 02:45:22 No.2027231 Report

Quoted By: >>2027233

Turning Los Angeles into a high-speed rail hub would be such an awesome transformation to watch. LA would go from the most car-dependent big city to the most rail-friendly city.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 02:49:49 No.2027233 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027231
>LA would go from the most car-dependent big city to the most rail-friendly city.
How?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 16:34:12 No.2027275 Report

Quoted By: >>2027277 >>2029060

>>2027142
Atlanta is weird. It has fuckall connectivity to the rest of the Amtrak system.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 16:58:14 No.2027277 Report

Quoted By: >>2027289

>>2027275
Connecting it to Florida is tough but given the population on either side it’s an essential connection.
You can easily connect Atlanta to Chattanooga (and then Nashville), and Greenberg and Charlotte. Given its huge size and growth it needs some rail connections to nearby cities.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 18:32:07 No.2027289 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027277
>Greenberg
Foreigner found

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 08 Dec 2024 12:34:06 No.2027334 Report

Quoted By: >>2027338

>>2027142
Maybe Amtrak should serve major cities outside of the East and West Coasts more than twice a week before even thinking about a nationwide HSR

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 08 Dec 2024 13:49:37 No.2027338 Report

Quoted By: >>2027367

>>2027334
>more than twice a week before even thinking about a nationwide HSR
I think the implication is that without high speed rail, the cross country trains are just expensive heritage train rides. You can't seriously use them to go from Washington to Chicago because it takes 18 hours.
That's an average speed of less than 75 MPH. If the train consistently did 125 MPH, the trip would take about 6.5 hours.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 08 Dec 2024 21:45:26 No.2027367 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027338
A flight is still around four hours, though.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO TrainStation.jpg, 24KiB, 474x296

Anonymous Mon 09 Dec 2024 00:07:04 No.2027371 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027142
>Levy
This line.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Dec 2024 01:35:46 No.2028843 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027142
none of these because they dont go to my city

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Dec 2024 16:04:41 No.2029060 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027275
Nashville is even weirder. It has no passenger rail despite being close to several major cities and smaller cities. Tennessee is pretty densely-populated and Nashville is growing big-time so they need to build some kind of rail.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Dec 2024 16:33:58 No.2029068 Report

Quoted By:

>>2027142
The PNW line because I live in Seattle and want to swiftly coomute to superior Vancouver whores.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Dec 2024 16:58:50 No.2029076 Report

Quoted By:

The Montreal/Ottowa/Toronto/Detroit line actually looks the most financially feasible. Add a connection to Boston or NYC and everyone's riding it for vacation.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches