>>982031You are an idiot aren't you. Never had a chemistry class? The energy it takes to split a water molecule into hydrogen and oxygen is MORE then the energy that is released by burning hydrogen (aka creating water by merging hydrogen and oxygen.)
Why not just use the electric energy you used to split the water to propel the vehicle in the first place?
>>982072You can't read. Ofcourse you can burn hydrogen, it's just not economically feasible because you first have to create hydrogen which takes more energy that the energy that is released by burning it. Now if we found large hydrogen gas pockets in the earth, then we are talking differently, but there aren't.
It's like retarded leftists saying hey, wind turbines are good for the environment, meanwhile it costs more energy to create the wind turbines than what they'll deliver. It's not economically feasible and therefore it needs subsidy to survive, and environmentally it is even worse.
