>>325013If we argue "truly", then we wouldn't have much in any kind of education other than math to talk about anything.
I can't know how much you remember about history, but simple accusations of being gay caused problems, so it's only natural they kept it hidden and would need further research to see if there's anything to find.
But then we also run into the issue of what constitutes a historical figure. If we allow philosophers, we can a bunch of bi people. Is that gay enough to trigger people? Military figures, typically the lower ranks though, would be with those around them, is it gay enough if it's only at sea?
A lot of archealogical research is based on a lot of speculation too, we still haven't mapped the insides if pyramids but does that make talk about where upper passages lead to "wrong" to talk about?
