/news/ - News » Thread #596675

[126 / 1 / ?]

32KiB, 645x363, bidenjoe_03122020getty.jpg

Biden Allegations

Anonymous Tue 05 May 2020 05:34:37 No.596675 View View Reply Original Report

Why isn't the MSM treating the Biden allegations in the same fiery passion like they did with Kavanaugh and Trump? It's fucking ridiculous how slight the media attention is at large. I'm not a Trump supporter and I was 50/50 on the Kavanaugh hearings... and I get it, I get it. I'm not that naive... I understand that the MSM has divided loyalties between the DNC and the RNC. I'm just wondering why this is being so hushed.

#BelieveAllWomen was the biggest fucking joke in recent memory. I mean, Jesus fucking Christ... Is it only okay when the rapist is the guy who's playing on YOUR team? Even if Reid is lying out of her ass, which she very well might be, it's the media's responsibility to treat the story with the same propensity, is it not?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/02/us/politics/tara-reade-joe-biden-metoo.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 00:31:51 No.597269 Report

Quoted By: >>597284

>>597253
>Ehh
I suppose there's a chance that him being accused of various rapes and sexual assaults over the course of 40 years, settling several sexual assault allegations out of court, being accused by several underaged Miss America contestants about walking into their dressing rooms and "joking" about having sex with them, admitting to using his celebrity in order to sexually assault married women on camera and publicly lusting after his own daughter is just one big coincidence. Maybe its all a liberal conspiracy to make the guy who sold shitty frozen steaks on late night informercials and was busted for running a fake college look bad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 00:44:55 No.597284 Report

Quoted By:

>>597253
>>597269
Also, before you try to dismiss the most key allegation here, Trump openly admitted to walking in on naked, underaged Miss America and Teen America contestants on Howard Stern. He bragged about it, stating it was his right to do so because he was the owner. Ivanka even confirmed it with a shrug and a "Yeah, he does that." Google it. If everyone is really as perturbed by Biden's hair sniffing problem as they claim they are then I'm sure Trump openly admitted that he barges into dressing rooms to view naked children will be of great concern to you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 17:54:21 No.597740 Report

Quoted By: >>597747

>>596803
Except it's not a double standard given Christine Blasey Ford's story remained consistent and Kavanaugh had a live melt down in front of America show at the very best, he did not have the temperament to serve on the supreme court.
The only double standard was once again it's alright to do anything, as long as you are a conservative.

And of course they want to sweep what Kavanaugh did, let alone all the rapes Trump committed under the rug to focus on Biden.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 18:11:40 No.597747 Report

Quoted By: >>597864 >>598600

>>597740
>and Kavanaugh had a live melt down in front of America show at the very best
Yeah no shit, he was literally slandered by the media, and everybody now thinks this guy is a disgusting piece of trash without any credible evidence.

That's what happens when you are refused due process by a party that uses sexual assault victims as political pawns.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 18:14:56 No.597748 Report

Quoted By:

>>596675
https://www.twitch.tv/jimfrank89

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 22:54:29 No.597864 Report

Quoted By: >>597866 >>597967

>>597747
>Yeah no shit, he was literally slandered by the media
Maybe having such thin skin that reporters saying mean things to you drives you to have a complete tantrum on national television is not a trait becoming of a supreme court judge.

>everybody now thinks this guy is a disgusting piece of trash without any credible evidence.
If you bothered to listen to any of the testimony you'd know that people thought he was a disgusting piece of shit long before the confirmation hearings.

>That's what happens when you are refused due process
It wasn't a court trial you dipshit. Aside from that, conservatives made sure to hobble the FBI investigation and prevent them from conducting dozens of follow up interviews to make sure their guy got in. "HELP WE'RE THE REAL VICTIMS" has been the default GOP defense for years. None of this comes as a surprise.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 22:58:09 No.597866 Report

Quoted By: >>597868

>>597864
>democrats say republicans are bad
wow shocker

i guess he can't be a supreme court justice anymore

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 23:05:07 No.597868 Report

Quoted By: >>597869

>>597866
>democrats say republicans are bad
Is that the best strawman we could come up with? We literally saw that red faced goon melt down on live television with our own lies. The confirmation hearings were not meant to charge him with a crime but determine whether or not he had the temperament to serve as a judge in the highest court of our country. A former alcoholic rich frat boy frothing at the mouth at the ridiculousness of being accused of sexually inappropriate behavior kind of gave us our answer. The country needed an even keeled intellectual who could at least feign the desire for amicability but instead we got a partisan lunatic jumping on the "everything bad is a liberal conspiracy" bandwagon. Their base cares more about upsetting Democrats than they do about the general welfare of our country so, obviously, their only move was to shroud Kavanaugh in the perpetual cloak of victimhood they use to dismiss the rest of their treasonous and incompetent behavior.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 23:07:23 No.597869 Report

Quoted By: >>597878 >>597879

>>597868
>The confirmation hearings were not meant to charge him with a crime
The confirmation hearings were there so that he could be accused of sexual assault, which would make him unqualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. The "temperament" thing is a braindead consolation prize that liberals settled on after they couldn't make the charges stick.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 23:25:40 No.597878 Report

Quoted By:

>>597869
>The confirmation hearings were there so that he could be accused of sexual assault
The confirmation hearings are separate events from the testimony of Blasey Ford. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

>which would make him unqualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice
Someone being accused of sexual assault is an event that can't be ignored when considering someone for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land, dipshit.

>The "temperament" thing is a braindead consolation prize that liberals settled on after they couldn't make the charges stick.
The "temperament" thing was a literal event broadcast on national television of Kavanaugh and a batallion of Trump loyalists foaming at the mouth and baselessly accusing their political opponents of conspiracy theories. You keep pretending like Democrats somehow orchestrated Kavanaugh acting like a petulant child. He gave that performance all on his own. You also completely ignore that Blasey Ford wasn't the only aspect of the confirmation hearings. His 83 uninvestigated and subsequently dismissed ethics complaints were also a point of contention. Obviously that doesn't factor into your arguments because the GOP propaganda machine wanted you to solely focus on their narrative of the "deep state" trying to smear a good man.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 23:26:42 No.597879 Report

Quoted By: >>597886

>>597869
>after they couldn't make the charges stick.
There were no charges. How many times does it need to be explained to you that the confirmation hearings were not a court of law. No one was being charged with anything. How is it you know so little about the subject you're talking about?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 23:37:33 No.597886 Report

Quoted By: >>597904

>>597879
>baselessly accusing their political opponents of conspiracy theories.
Except, of course, where there were in fact plenty of actual conspiracy theories being thrown at him.

>There were no charges. How many times does it need to be explained to you that the confirmation hearings were not a court of law.
Yeah, it would make sense for Kavanaugh to be unhappy about being CHARGED with sexual assault, but he was only ACCUSED of sexual assault. Why the other day, I saw a man framed by the cops lose his temper and that proves that he's unfit to do anything. Makes perfect sense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 23:53:24 No.597904 Report

Quoted By: >>597910

>>597886
>Except, of course, where there were in fact plenty of actual conspiracy theories being thrown at him
List one. HARD MODE - being accused by several people of sexual assault while you were a drunk college kid isn't a conspiracy theory unless you can somehow prove these women were members of a covert, influential organization.

>Why the other day, I saw a man framed by the cops lose his temper and that proves that he's unfit to do anything. Makes perfect sense.
This is a really weak strawman. Nobody is saying that some random guy isn't fit to do "anything" because of a public tantrum. The specific allegation is that Kavanaugh, with his long history of ethics complaints, is is unfit to perform the specific job of supreme court justice because of a temper tantrum he threw on national television in which he basically accused Democrats of conspiracy theories. He clearly, blatantly displayed his inability to be objective and non-partisan which is, arguably, one of the most important requirements to be a supreme court justice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2020 23:59:46 No.597910 Report

Quoted By: >>597915

>>597904
>HARD MODE - being accused by several people of sexual assault while you were a drunk college kid isn't a conspiracy theory unless you can somehow prove these women were members of a covert, influential organization.
A conspiracy requires two people. Avenatti and Swetnick ginned up a conspiracy to accuse Kavanaugh of engaging in "gang rape" parties, and their allies gave them the airtime for it. And he has no "history" of ethics complaints - the ethics complaints were ginned up in response to his nomination for the Supreme Court.

>with his long history of ethics complaints, is is unfit to perform the specific job of supreme court justice because of a temper tantrum he threw on national television
He lost his temper in response to a crisis engineered by Democrats. His behavior isn't ideal, but rewarding the Democrats for creating one to bring him down is far more disgusting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 00:07:40 No.597915 Report

Quoted By: >>597936 >>597948

>>597910
>Avenatti and Swetnick ginned up a conspiracy to accuse Kavanaugh of engaging in "gang rape" parties, and their allies gave them the airtime for it.
Provide evidence of this.

>And he has no "history" of ethics complaints - the ethics complaints were ginned up in response to his nomination for the Supreme Court.
100% false. Now you're just lying.

>https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2019/03/20/the-10th-circuit-again-ducks-ruling-on-ethics-complaints-against-kavanaugh/#38cc1583c512

>Some 83 ethics complaints had been filed against Judge Kavanaugh alleging not only false statements under oath during hearings on his nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in 2004 and 2006, but also, more flagrantly, misconduct at the nomination hearing for the U.S. Supreme Court itself in 2018, including making inappropriate partisan statements and treating senators with disrespect.

>He lost his temper in response to a crisis engineered by Democrats.
Conspiracy theory.

>His behavior isn't ideal, but rewarding the Democrats for creating one to bring him down is far more disgusting.
You just proved my statement correct. The GOP and their base care more about harming Democrats than they do about actual, common sense policy. Also, you would hope that people charged with deciding who gets a lifetime appointment to the highest court in our country would make sure that the potential nominee had ideal behavior. Settling for a subpar nominee as a swipe against Democrats is beyond childish and, again, you pretty much just admited it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 00:31:47 No.597936 Report

Quoted By: >>597965

>>597915
>Provide evidence of this.
Are you unaware that Avenatti was Swetnick's lawyer, or of the gang rape accusations?

>100% false. Now you're just lying.
They filed complaints in 2018 about everything Kavanaugh had ever done in his life. That's not a "history" of ethics complaints. That's a bunch of shit ginned up after the fact.

>actual, common sense policy
Translation: "Policy I agree with."

>Settling for a subpar nominee as a swipe against Democrats is beyond childish and, again, you pretty much just admited it.
Kavanaugh is perfectly legally qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice. Even the American Bar Association could not find an excuse to sink him based on his expertise in the law.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 01:20:02 No.597947 Report

Quoted By: >>597959

>>596701
No we are just interested into pointing out hypocritical behavior of democrats and the media, discrediting them further to normies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 01:22:41 No.597948 Report

Quoted By: >>597954

>>597915
lol dude, the guy seemed 100% fine and normal. I don't know what you're talking about. There are times to be mad, it's ok to show some anger when you're featured on a 3 month political smear campaign with the mass media on it.

It's just a made up point you push, you just don't like him and wish he was removed no matter the means.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 02:01:04 No.597954 Report

Quoted By:

>>597948
You fool. You really think it was about Kavanaugh, instead of salvaging something out of Mitch McConnell's bullshit that is going to affect the courts for 40 years?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 02:33:49 No.597959 Report

Quoted By: >>597995

>>597947
>No we are just interested into pointing out hypocritical behavior of democrats
Pointing out the hypocritical nature of Democrats by highlighting your own hypocrisy. With Biden it is "believe all women" but for Trump, who has been accused of rape and sexual assault dozens of times, publicly admitted to wanting to fuck his own daughter and also publicly admitted to walking into dressing rooms when he owned Miss America to look at naked underaged girls its "liberal media conspiracy to make orange man look bad".

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 02:38:46 No.597963 Report

Quoted By:

>>597025
Biden's getting coverage though, and since Reade hasn't been consistent the situations aren't as comparable as you think.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 02:43:21 No.597965 Report

Quoted By: >>597976

>>597936
>Are you unaware that Avenatti was Swetnick's lawyer, or of the gang rape accusations?
Don't answer my question with another question. You claimed they "ginned up" this conspiracy. Now prove it. Provide your source of information.

>They filed complaints in 2018 about everything Kavanaugh had ever done in his life.
100% false. Now you're just lying. Read the article. The complaints went back all the way to 2006.

>Translation: "Policy I agree with."
Strawman. Try again.

>Even the American Bar Association could not find an excuse to sink him based on his expertise in the law.

Another lie you just pulled out of your ass.

>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/02/us/politics/kavanaugh-bar-association-aba.html

>Kavanaugh is perfectly legally qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice.
Legally qualification isn't the point of contention. Just because I'm legally qualified for a job doesn't mean I fit the other criteria or am the best person for the job. The GOP knew he wasn't fit. The american bar knew he wasn't fit. Conservatives pushed him through to punish Democrats, just like you said.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 02:48:17 No.597967 Report

Quoted By: >>597981

>>597864
>Maybe having such thin skin that reporters saying mean things to you drives you to have a complete tantrum on national television is not a trait becoming of a supreme court judge.
Bruh. His family was targeted, receiving nonstop death threats for months. The fact that he hasn't tracked down and murdered every person responsible for that level of slander is a testament to his character.
>If you bothered to listen to any of the testimony
Whose testimony? The woman who alleged that he did something horrendous 30+ years ago, whose memory was not only unreliable, but couldn't provide any actual proof beyond her word? The same person whose memory alone was deemed adequate evidence to destroy the life of a judge by the Democratic party?
>It wasn't a court trial you dipshit.
Presumption of innocence doesn't require a trial to be applicable you stupid idiot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 03:05:08 No.597976 Report

Quoted By: >>597986

>>597965
>You claimed they "ginned up" this conspiracy. Now prove it. Provide your source of information.
They generated a false claim with no basis in fact. What else is there to "gin up"?

>100% false. Now you're just lying. Read the article. The complaints went back all the way to 2006.
Yes. Complaints in 2018 about behavior dating back to 2006, which is why the Tenth Circuit had to adjudicate them in 2018. Exactly what I fucking said, you illiterate retard. If it were an *actual history* the complaints would have been adjudicated in 2008 and not 2018.

>Another lie you just pulled out of your ass.
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/aba_committee_gives_kavanaugh_a_well-qualified_rating_hearings_begin_today

Really makes you think.

>The GOP knew he wasn't fit. The american bar knew he wasn't fit. Conservatives pushed him through to punish Democrats, just like you said.
The GOP knew he was fit. They knew to judge a man by his career, not how he responds to a month-long campaign of slanderous little shitheads such as yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 03:09:12 No.597981 Report

Quoted By: >>598057

>>597967
>Bruh. His family was targeted, receiving nonstop death threats for months.
So, what, we shouldn't investigate the histories of public figures because it might be bad for their families?

>The fact that he hasn't tracked down and murdered every person responsible for that level of slander is a testament to his character.
Funny joke.

>Whose testimony?
The entirety of the confirmation hearings, dipshit.

>Presumption of innocence doesn't require a trial to be applicable you stupid idiot.
There is no presumption of innocence in confirmation hearings you fucking moron. All information relevant to the confirmation of a nominee is investigated and discussed to give the governing body the ability to make the most informed decision possible. Whether or not he's innocent or guilty was up to each individual person voting on his confirmation. Presumed innocence is irrelevant to the purpose of the hearings. You are absolutely retarded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 03:13:53 No.597986 Report

Quoted By: >>597989

>>597976
>They generated a false claim with no basis in fact. What else is there to "gin up"?
So you don't have any evidence of your claim? Ok. That's all you had to say.

>Yes. Complaints in 2018 about behavior dating back to 2006, which is why the Tenth Circuit had to adjudicate them in 2018. Exactly what I fucking said, you illiterate retard.
Jesus Christ, anon. Read the article. I'm not going to hold your hand through this.

>The GOP knew he was fit.
You literally just said that they made their decisions based on their unwillingness to "award" Democrats. You can't even keep your own bullshit straight.

>They knew to judge a man by his career, not how he responds to a month-long campaign of slanderous little shitheads such as yourself.
Yes yes, we know. Every bad thing ever reported about a conservative is a liberal conspiracy. Your shilling for a cult of spineless worms is fucking pathetic. You guys can't even take responsibility for your own actions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 03:17:54 No.597988 Report

Quoted By:

>>596683
Get the fuck out of here retard shill bitch

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 03:18:02 No.597989 Report

Quoted By:

>>597986
>So you don't have any evidence of your claim?
I don't have to prove that Swetnick's claim is false. You can present evidence that it's true. Good fucking luck.

>Jesus Christ, anon. Read the article. I'm not going to hold your hand through this.
I did, shit-for-brains. There's not a single fucking line in your article mentioning that any one of the complaints was filed before 2018. Typical of your kind, to cite articles that don't support even in the slightest the claims that you're making.

>You literally just said that they made their decisions based on their unwillingness to "award" Democrats. You can't even keep your own bullshit straight.
You and your ilk engaged in months of sustained character assassination in an attempt to destroy him, and used his reaction to your campaign to claim it was justified in the first place. The same kind of braindead circular logic cops can use to retroactively justify beating the shit out of random people by claiming that they resisted arrest.

If the cops beat the shit out of someone and he punches one of the cops back, we don't arrest him for it, because that "rewards" the cops. It's a basic principle that you feel the need to twist however you can.

>Yes yes, we know. Every bad thing ever reported about a conservative is a liberal conspiracy.
You're engaging in one literally as we speak. Might as well claim you're not raping someone while continuing the act while making the claim.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 03:25:09 No.597995 Report

Quoted By:

>>597959
no, we say believe women to mock you. we don't know if it's true or not, but her story has more collaborative proof compared to kavanaughs accuser. You're the hypocrite. and stupid too btw.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 05:03:25 No.598039 Report

Quoted By:

>>596798
Constantly changing allegations and inconsistencies in character is common for those who have been sexually abused.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 05:30:56 No.598049 Report

Quoted By:

>>596675
they should get around to it after dealing with trumps multiple rape accusations

(dude you dont even watch or youd know it gets talked about so fuck off vlad)

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 06:03:20 No.598057 Report

Quoted By: >>598063

>>597981
>So, what, we shouldn't investigate the histories of public figures because it might be bad for their families?
I don't know how the fuck you manage to confuse "investigate" with "broadcast slander and libel" but I'm sure there's a logical reason.
>The entirety of the confirmation hearings, dipshit.
Please point out the lie you are attempting to use as an argument.
>There is no presumption of innocence in confirmation hearings you fucking moron.
Knock knock. Who's there? Oh fuck, it's the bill of rights, guaranteeing inalienable civil liberties to all Americans regardless of your feelings. You can leave out the nearest window, commie coward.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 06:14:23 No.598059 Report

Quoted By: >>598083

>>596683
>Because unlike Ford's allegations against Kavanaugh, which were actually plausible

Imagine being intellectually dishonest enough to unironically think this.

Imagine actually and literally being this stupid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 06:18:36 No.598061 Report

Quoted By: >>598064

same thing with all the liberal hypocrisy.
Gov Northam Black Face
Lt Gov Fairfax sex allegations
Bush bad for drinking underage>Obama just being a kid drinking and smoking underage
Meghan Kelly (spelling?) gets fired for seeing nothing wrong with black face multiple anchors dressing as black face as recent as 2012 get pass.
Frodo acts like a prick on camera gets pass.
Bush caused war let's entire foreign Intel committee pass
I works on both side at least the conservative side owns it.
By the way I this Trump is and Idiot but unfortunately I'll take an idiot that is real over the options are now
voted gore 00, bush 04, Obama 08, nobody 12, trump 16

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 06:42:39 No.598063 Report

Quoted By: >>598066

>>598057
>I don't know how the fuck you manage to confuse "investigate" with "broadcast slander and libel"
Its not slander and libel unless you prove it. Its not slander and libel just because you don't want to believe it.

>Oh fuck, it's the bill of rights, guaranteeing inalienable civil liberties to all Americans regardless of your feelings
That has absolutely nothing to do with confirmation hearings or the appointment of supreme court justices. You're a fucking moron.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 06:45:48 No.598064 Report

Quoted By:

>>598061
Imagine thinking the Conservative media doesn't do the same shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 06:53:29 No.598066 Report

Quoted By: >>598084

>>598063
>Its not slander and libel unless you prove it.
It is literally slander and libel to publish and broadcast false statements, and presumption of innocence still holds true.
>That has absolutely nothing to do with confirmation hearings or the appointment of supreme court justices.
It absolutely does. Presumption of innocence doesn't just apply within a legal framework. If I accuse you of being a drug dealer, I am still responsible for providing evidence, otherwise the accusation falls apart. There is no precedent to remove a SCOTUS nominee based on accusations made without proof, and if you are literally too stupid to understand how this coincides with Democratic senators BUILDING ARGUMENTS based off of UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS, you are a faggot and a half.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 07:53:00 No.598083 Report

Quoted By:

>>598059
it's *plausible* that any given guy played grabass with some girl when he was in high school

plausible is literally the lowest bar of all. anything that's not outright implausible is... plausible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 07:57:22 No.598084 Report

Quoted By: >>598657

>>598066
>t is literally slander and libel to publish and broadcast false statements
Prove its false. If you can't, it isn't libel and slander. You have absolutely no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

>it is literally slander and libel to publish and broadcast false statements
Presumption of innocence is irrelevant to libel and slander cases. Libel and slander is a civil issue, not a criminal one. Guilt and innocence are irrelevant concepts.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 22:44:49 No.598598 Report

Quoted By: >>598626

>>596683

Ford's allegations are only plausible if you listened to media pundit opinions instead of applied some basic ass logic.

Everything Ford "Couldn't remember" were the three things that would be required for any legitimate investigation to take place: Time, Location, motive, people. Where did it happen? Can't remember. Who else was there to witness? Can't remember but DEFINITLY TEH KAVANAUGH. When? Can't remember.

If you aren't a complete idiot, you should have been able to spot that this is very suspicious. Everything she "couldn't remember" were factors that would make her case VERIFIABLE. And yes VERIFIABLE needs to be in caps lock because it's a concept that many clueless people seem to completely skimp right over and fail to realize how astronomically fucking important it is.

When something is unverifiable, it puts it in an interesting position where it is both impossible to prove AND impossible to disprove. This way her story would ride purely on the wave of the #MeToo movement culture which would place ANY sexual assault allegation in a de-facto guilty until proven innocent situation.

Do you see the massive gaping logical problem here? The problem is that making her case UNVERFIABLE is 100% EXACTLY what we would expect in the cultural climate that her allegations happened if she was lying. If you want to slander someone during the #metoo movement, accusing them of a sex crime and then "not remembering" any key details that would make the case ACTUALLY FUCKING VERIFIABLE is basically the perfect slander. You couldn't be dis-proven, and because of the cultural climate the person you are slandering is automatically portrayed as guilty. The perfect bullshit story, except for the fatal flaw that it only works on people who are fucking idiots.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 22:47:34 No.598600 Report

Quoted By: >>598624

>>597747
An innocent man wouldn't act like he did. It just proves he did rape Ford.
Same with Trump, who raped multiple women and is now filing lawsuits to silence them.

The focus here should be on real rapists like Kavanaugh and Trump to bring them to justice instead of the witch hunt you're trying to create to distract from their crimes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 23:44:43 No.598624 Report

Quoted By: >>598658

>>598600
>An innocent man wouldn't act like he did. It just proves he did rape Ford.
Go fuck yourself, gaslighter. Anger is absolutely an appropriate reaction to being wrongly accused of a terrible crime.

>Same with Trump, who raped multiple women and is now filing lawsuits to silence them.
What happened to all of the lawsuits all of those victims supposedly filled? Did they vanish?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 May 2020 23:48:52 No.598626 Report

Quoted By: >>598679

>>598598
>Who else was there to witness?
She actually named several people who were supposed to be direct first hand witnesses of Kavanaugh going into a room with her passed out self, and every single person testified they didn't see anything had no knowledge of that happening. At best they can only say Kavanaugh was at the party, at some time, /maybe/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 00:51:37 No.598655 Report

Quoted By:

whatever you do Biden for your VP:

don't choose Abrams or Kamala Harris bc
they are too polarizing and a sure November loss

WE CANNOT GO BACK TO OBAMA DAYS!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 01:04:19 No.598657 Report

Quoted By:

>>598084
>Libel and slander is a civil issue, not a criminal one.
Google Criminal Defamation.
>Prove its false.
If I can't prove an allegation, but declare it as the truth anyways, it's a false statement by default, shitdicker.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 01:05:06 No.598658 Report

Quoted By:

>>598624
Cope more rape apologist, it shows how amoral and corrupt the Republicans are that they would rather install an emotionally unstable rapist on the supreme court than any of their other 'qualified' candidates.
Also they're still going through the courts, Trump wants to run out the clock, just like with all his other crimes being tied up in the courts until after the election.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 01:33:01 No.598679 Report

Quoted By:

>>598626

Which just goes to show how brainwashed the public was at the time of Ford hearing.

Her story was complete bullshit. The very little information she had that could be checked out, didn't check out. Her testimony given before congress was obviously scripted and intentionally written to be jam packed with as much progressive "I'm teh victim but I'm also teh strongk womyn" virtue signalling as possible.

Anyone who believes Fords story is either a partisan twat suffering from a typical case of confirmation bias, or just a plain old fashioned gullible retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 02:11:16 No.598702 Report

Quoted By:

>>596687

>unironically playing the bandwagon fallacy card

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 02:22:29 No.598706 Report

Quoted By:

>>596683
>Because unlike Ford's allegations against Kavanaugh, which were actually plausible, these allegations against Biden don't make any sense at all. He pushed his congressional aide against the wall in a public place in the US Capitol building and fingerbanged her? Really? And nobody else saw or heard it? Amazing.
Whatever happened to “believe ALL women”

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 03:56:16 No.598706,1 Report Delete

Quoted By:

lmao partisan faggot jannies.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Biden Allegations