/news/ - News » Displaying all posts with no filters applied.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:48:53 No.1488916 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488910
>They literally fucking do through the UCMJ. All this talk of international law is equally retarded because the US armed forces are the primary enforcement mechanism behind international law in the western world.
So you're literally just arguing the US military is above all laws, including its own?

Yeah good luck with that court argument. Will probably go about as well as this attempt to bring charges that failed so miserably you tried to insist the whole jury lied about being impartial.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:48:21 No.1488915 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488912
>DC jury

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:48:09 No.1488914 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488891
I was wondering someone would sprinkle in some Nixon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:47:21 No.1488913 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488907
The Judiciary has oversight over the military you absolute fucking retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:47:12 No.1488912 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488915

>>1488908
You're the one saying "NO HE BROKE THE LAW HE BROKE THE LAW" after two consecutive legal failures that said otherwise.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:47:03 No.1488911 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488873
>>1488874
>you
I'm not the one you speak of.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:46:52 No.1488910 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488916

>>1488907
>Yes but they don't decide what a war crime is
They literally fucking do through the UCMJ. All this talk of international law is equally retarded because the US armed forces are the primary enforcement mechanism behind international law in the western world.
We literally kidnapped the leader of a foreign government one month ago, what are you even talking about.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:46:11 No.1488909 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488906
Does the video where they remind them of their oath that says "do not obey illegal orders" say what is and is not an illegal order?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:45:57 No.1488908 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488912

>>1488857
>>1488899
If thats how you want it to be, thats cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:45:10 No.1488907 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488910 >>1488913

>>1488900
>The exeucitve branch has plenary authority to investigate and prosecute warcrimes.
Yes but they don't decide what a war crime is, which is what you're saying. Arguing "well they can just not persecute them for them!" doesn't mean they didn't commit a war crime. It also doesn't mean refusing to obey illegal orders is a crime.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:44:02 No.1488906 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488909

>>1488904
>whats the problem with Dems saying THESE ORDERS ARE ILLEGAL
>and then making a video to soldiers how they must not obey illegal orders
Total mystery.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:43:06 No.1488905 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488902
International law doesn't apply to the US government, and the Executive Branch manages the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) through the President.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:42:46 No.1488904 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488906

>>1488901
>You only get to disobey orders that are OBVIOUSLY illegal.
Yeah so what is the problem with reminding them of that? You said it yourself, they get told this at bootcamp. Unless the Trump admin has been giving blatantly illegal orders there should be no issue with reminding them of that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:42:40 No.1488903 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>1488898
Nigga, idk who you're arguing against. Perhaps you're too stupid to know whats being argued.

>>1488897
>Well, you see I said the strikes in the Caribbean are illegal, and I told the soldiers to disobey illegal orders but I didnt do both at once so it doesn't count

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:41:29 No.1488902 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488905

>>1488896
>the executive branch decides whether a warcrime has been committed.
No it doesn't lol. The executive cannot override congressional and international standards on what is and is not a war crime.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:41:15 No.1488901 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488904

>>1488892
>I know how the UCMJ works
You only get to disobey orders that are OBVIOUSLY illegal. You dont get to disobey orders that MAY be illegal based on proportionality or target classifications. You literally get taught this at basic. I can still hear my DI literally screaming at us
>If you can DEBATE IT you OBEY IT.

Kelly, and those Dems know exactly what they are doing and its absolutely fucked up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:40:57 No.1488900 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488907

>>1488894
Yes, it does. The exeucitve branch has plenary authority to investigate and prosecute warcrimes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:40:40 No.1488899 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488908

>>1488851
>he implicitly broke it and you're saying that its totally cool and 100% okay
No. Cool people do crimes. It is 100% okay though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:40:29 No.1488898 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488903

>>1488895
Very good. So then it is in fact possible for the head of the executive to give an illegal order. And therefore, it is the duty of the executive to not obey that illegal order per their own code of conduct.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:39:29 No.1488897 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488903

>>1488893
Yes actually. Did that video suggest what laws are and aren't lawful? Because if it didn't, your entire case that the video is "seditious" falls the fuck apart.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:38:57 No.1488896 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488902

>>1488892
>objectively illegal
To reiterate: the executive branch decides whether a warcrime has been committed. So they get to decide whether their own orders are legal. Not elected representatives.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:38:37 No.1488895 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488898

>>1488892
No.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:38:28 No.1488894 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488900

>>1488891
>Because the executive branch determines whether or not something constitutes a warcrime.
No it doesn't lol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:37:36 No.1488893 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488897

>>1488889
>tee...hee... hee we did it at different times so it doesnt count!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Feb 2026 04:37:27 No.1488892 View View Report

Quoted By: >>1488895 >>1488896 >>1488901

>>1488890
That's not what I asked. If the head of the executive gave an order that was objectively illegal, such as to commit a war crime, would it be legal? Yes. Or. No?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Displaying all posts with no filters applied. Returning only first 5000 of 1484334 results found.

On these archives

Your latest searches