Quoted By:
He went on to explain that Congress should know that whatever data is in the public domain “has no relation to any forensic copy attached to a Hunter Biden laptop. And it looks like, to us, that most of the data is curated. It’s almost like a mixtape of multiple data sources that’s gone through the hands of 30 or 40 people.”
If Riggleman is correct, then perhaps Hunter Biden hasn’t committed the “crime of the century” but has been the victim of others manipulating things to make it look like he has. What we already know is that Bill Barr’s DOJ during the Trump administration investigated everything they could about Hunter Biden and the infamous laptop. Just this year, what was supposed to be the “bombshell” of the “Crime of the century” ended up being some routine tax violations and discrepancies, which Hunter Biden and the government worked out reasonable terms to remedy. Beyond that, most know about his struggles with substance abuse and otherr “character flaws” that might be uncouth, but not necessarily criminal.
On the other side of the coin, Giuliani and James Comer have been all too eager to drop bombs on right wing media only to have those claims debunked or walked back in short order.
Earlier this year, Giuliani claimed to have a “whistleblower” who had all the proof on “The Biden Crime Family” that anyone would need. Comer echoed his announcement, but when asked for any proof, Comer 1st claimed that they literally “lost” the valuable witness. A short time later, predictably, Giuliani announced that the whistleblower was dead … and implied it was a mafia-style “hit” done by, yeah, you guessed it … “The Biden Crime Family.”
It is unlikely Denver Riggleman will be backing off of his claims as he seems to be intending to take them into a court of law where he will try to prove his case.
