>>1199525>I'm not obligated to do anything you posted.You're right. You're not but you should for your own sake of self respect if you want other spectators of the conversation to take you seriously. Otherwise they just see you for the bastard you are.
>Is this the first time someone is pointing that out to you? Do you want a cookie any time you post something I happen to agree with? It that it, you can't function without that validation? Pathetic.Nothing of substance found in this part. R*ddit tier hot air about wanting cookies and validation when the primary goal of my standard is to get you to respect yourself in front of others. As stated before; you don't have to but it's a bad look for someone engaging in discourse.
>And there you went, blatant lies. Ive not made any posts here concerning "accept more hoaxes"Yes you did. You made posts ignorant of the context of the last 8 years.
Here:
>>1199514>let it play out is about as open ended as one can get and covers the entirety of possible processes and outcomes.Here:
>>1199495>Here is a clue, asshat, innocent people do ger prosecuted. Those persons also suffer outside the court. That is simply called life.And a few others I have to leave out for the sake of character limit.
>It's odd that you think wanting to apply the law equally is cultish.You keep saying that but it is demonstrably and provably false in regards to Hillary, Biden, Obama, Comey, the FBI agents Strzk and co. from the Russian collusion narrative, Clapper, Brennan, the MSM that facilitated all the hoaxes, Fauci, Garland, etc vs. Trump.
>You consistently read your own bias into my replies. You insert your own thoughts between the lines, it's the only way you can justify your fucked up mind.Feel free to elaborate on this claim of yours by backing it up with any sort of worthwhile conjecture or reason. Making a statement and proving/supporting a statement are two different things.
