>>1122012>All subs must surface at choke points within the Baltic, that is a fact.Prove a smaller attack sub can't go through undetected East of Zealand in the dead of night, even if it temporarily surfaces.
>I am deludedYes, you are. You're right about that at least. You think Russian agents destroy Russian resources, hell you even think people disagreeing with you or questioning you are Russian agents. I at least told you what you were deluded about, you're an idiot playing "no u".
>I linked to a source that already did that.Are you the one who didn't even link to a source but just said "spaceknow"? So were you lying or deluded about doing your own nerd work figuring it all out, because you're actually citing someone else's? Funny, I already looked up the reporting on spaceknow's findings and that's why I'm sure you're wrong and deluded.
Here I'll show you how to actually link to a source on here:
https://www.wired.com/story/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-dark-ships/That was easy.
Let's see what it says:
"According to the analysis by satellite data monitoring firm SpaceKnow, the two “dark ships,” each measuring around 95 to 130 meters long, passed within several miles of the Nord Stream 2 leak sites."
" “They had their beacons off, meaning there was no information about their movement, and they were trying to keep their location information and general information hidden from the world,” Javornicky adds."
"SAR images of the dark ships shared with WIRED show the vessels as glowing objects, not far from the explosion site around Nord Stream 2. “We assume it was one of those two dark ships that we have detected, but we're not making any decision,” "
Oh no, they haven't identified them. They're not even sure if the ships did it or were just suspiciously nearby. Nor have any other current stories shared on google, or on the wiki page identified them. But if you have, then go ahead and present the evidence to the authorities, delusional anon.
