>>1229998>(it's also questionable that Yemenis close to terrorists constantly in Yemen were birthed in the US in the first placeAll three of them were. Even if the son and daughter weren't born on US soil, they'd still be citizens because the father was.
>and the case study rebukes the retard immigration system the US has)The father's father was a graduate exchange student at the time of his birth. A Fulbright scholar. I guess he and his wife had him while he was attending graduate school. Student visa holders aren't "immigrants", and the fact that people born on US soil are automatically citizens is enshrined in the constitution. So, you hate both due process and birthright citizenship? What's with your hatred of the constitution?
>However, you're saying the circumstances don't matter but they do. These people were in close enough proximity to terrorists enough times to lose family members on three separate occasions.So, besides "being near someone", what other circumstances justify the US government murdering a US citizen?
>Additionally, I do believe that the government has the right to take the life of an individual without due process in certain cases. For instance, if a police officer kills someone to save a victim whose life is at risk.Agreed. I think it is universally understood that law enforcement has an obligation to use lethal force when someone represents/demonstrates a direct threat of serious bodily harm to either a victim, law enforcement, or the general public. Otherwise, any alleged suspect is owed due process. Nothing I've said ITT contradicts this idea.
>But you're flip-flopping with your conviction here. The Branch Davidians had no due process, were attacked with an army, but they don't count for some reason in your scheme? Very odd. They were US citizens.I was waiting for you to intentionally misinterpret my post in bad faith. They attacked (with guns) law enforcement that was serving a warrant, thus forfeiting their right to due process.
