https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4301942-house-gop-pull-second-funding-bill-in-a-week/ House Republicans pulled their annual financial services and general government funding bill Thursday amid divisions on abortion-related provisions and FBI funding.
It was the second time in a week GOP leaders opted to punt a vote on a funding bill over divisions within the party.
GOP leadership hoped to pass the conference’s partisan plan laying out fiscal 2024 funding for the White House, the Treasury Department and other offices this week. But a planned vote was pulled at the last minute Thursday as the conference struggled to unify behind the measure.
Some moderate Republicans came out in opposition against language seeking to prohibit Washington, D.C., from carrying out a law that aims to protect people from employer discrimination based on their reproductive health decisions.
“I think that we need to be much more respectful of the difficult decision that women have to make,” Rep. Marc Molinaro (R-N.Y.) said of the thorny policy rider Wednesday. “I think we need to respect the city’s determination, and I think it’s a provision that is unnecessary in the bill.”
He told reporters shortly ahead of the planned vote Thursday that he was prepared to vote against the measure and suggested “there’s probably about five to eight of us that have expressed a concern regarding the one provision being placed in the bill.”
In the House Republicans’ narrow majority, just a handful of members can sink any partisan bill.
The bill has also faced opposition from the right flank amid scrutiny of the FBI, as some conservatives have accused the agency of political weaponization.
An amendment pushed by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) earlier this week sought to bar funding from being used “for the acquisition of property” for a new FBI headquarters.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
“I don’t believe that the FBI deserves a massive new headquarters or Washington field office,” he said, while accusing the agency of working to “censor factual information harmful to their preferred political candidates.” Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), who heads the subcommittee that crafted the bill, pushed back on Gaetz’s criticism at the time, saying, “it is bad policy for the Congress to be taking steps to deny a federal agency that is in serious need, in my opinion, of an improvement to their headquarters.” “Notice I said improvement,” Womack said on the floor. “I didn’t say some massive big expansion, necessarily. But what I do know is that when I toured the FBI headquarters, I saw it in a state of disrepair that is going to need the attention of the owners of that property. And that’s us.” But other conservatives are still critical of FBI funding. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) signaled he was a part of that camp in remarks to reporters Thursday, while saying he also planned to vote against the bill. “FBI was a big deal. I raised that on the floor with Womack. It’s in disrepair. Well, the FBI is in disrepair as well,” he said, adding the bill didn’t go far enough to cut spending. “I mean, we’re just nibbling around the edges,” Norman said, telling The Hill that the public is “tired of just going around in circles, and [if] we’re not going to cut, let’s just tell the American people we’re going bankrupt.” The bill is among the 12 annual government funding bills House Republicans sought to pass this month as they look to strengthen their hand in spending talks with Senate Democrats later this year. Like a chunk of the proposals, the bill considered Thursday seeks to cut spending partly by rolling back funding for Democratic priorities approved in the previous Congress, with a previous legislative summary detailing a pitch for clawing back billions of dollars in IRS funding.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Republicans have defended the cuts, pointing to the rising national debt and inflation, and hard-line conservatives are pressing for further reductions to spending. But Democrats have panned the proposed cuts to nondefense programs for going beyond a budget caps deal brokered between President Biden and House GOP leadership earlier this year, along with policy riders they call “poison pills.” House Republicans are looking to stake out what they’ve described as the most conservative starting point before negotiations ramp up with the Democratic-led Senate. But the approach has also made it difficult for House Republicans to pass the legislation with a narrow majority. “We don’t have the Democrats voting for it, because the bills are so conservative,” Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), another spending cardinal, said Thursday. But he also discussed the insufficient GOP support behind the plan. “They have the right to do that,” he said. “But it’s unfortunate because then we just lose leverage.” Earlier this week, House Republicans punted plans to vote on a housing and transportation government funding bill over concerns from some in the party about a proposed drop in dollars for Amtrak
theonehouse cantstanditsself
>>1234438 >House a house divided against it's self cannot stand.
It's time for a 3rd party
Anonymous
>>1234438 I never thought I would see the day when republicans were cheapskates about funding the FBI.
Anonymous
>>1234583 Republicans are all about defunding police with enough authority to actually hold them accountable.
Anonymous
>>1234583 The FBI is a homotranny cultist hideout. They pander to a certain group, which they're the reason law enforcement did exist at all. Law enforcement doesn't exist anymore.
>>1234587 I don't fund the aforementioned. Although you libtrannies wanted to defend them, period. You were trying to create a hellzone
Anonymous
>>1234587 Whereas Democrats are all about defunding police with enough authority to hold blacks accountable.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1234685 If by blacks you mean the rest of us, yeah. Cops might like to put their boots on the necks of Black people more of than the rest of us, but they don't think twice about putting their boot on your or my neck either. We have the highest incarceration rate in the world. We treat social problems with state violence. Shit needs to change.
The only people that think the FBI has too much funding are white collar criminals and pedophiles (ie Republicans).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1234675 >The FBI is a homotranny cultist hideout. Unironic mental illness
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1234583 It's only because the FBI is investigating their comes.
Anonymous
>>1234438 literally any time congress does anything its bad so by making congress not work the GOP is better than the dems
Anonymous
>>1235008 How did you get like this?
Anonymous
>>1235039 by paying attention and seeing how shitty the dems have been both federally and in my state.
Anonymous
>>1235040 paying attention to what? Breitbart?
Anonymous
>>1235042 self delusion and paranoid dreams brought on by extended semen retention
Anonymous
>>1235044 samefag
>>1235042 I literally cannot think of a single positive thing democrats have done in congress in my lifetime.
Anonymous
>>1235057 >I literally cannot think of a single positive thing democrats have done in congress in my lifetime I'm sure there's a lot you can't think of, anon.
Anonymous
>>1235062 Well, Bill Clinton did end welfare.
He was peak Democrat.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1234459 That's retarded. Republicans just need to quit fucking around.
Anonymous
>>1235057 Did you donate your stimulus check bank to the government?
Anonymous
>>1235108 If you mean he signed Newt Gingrich's bill then sure
Anonymous
>>1235134 >Realizes the president has veto power >Still tries to avoid blame How's this supposed to work?
Anonymous
>>1235141 It's called pandering to the center in order to win the 1996 election
Anonymous
>>1235148 He gave a away America to win an election?
That's not really a good thing.
>Ended welfare >Signed NAFTA >Created inroads for China to join the WTO >Repealed Glass-Steagall causing the housing crisis He should've lost. What an amoral asshole he was, and what amoral fucks Democrats are.
Fuck you all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1235151 >That's not really a good thing. It worked for Bill Clinton. I don't know why you're bitching about NAFTA when Trump's version is also identical.
>muh WTO >muh hate on Greenspan Yeah I see where this is going
Anonymous
>>1235151 >Repealed Glass-Steagall causing the housing crisis You know, I've noticed this as a semi-frequent right-wing talking point posted on this board: that Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall, which allowed subprime mortgages to be granted to unqualified borrowers (read by right-wingers: blacks), which led to the housing crash and the Great Recession. But, in my research to debunk this talking point the most recent time I saw it posted (like two months ago), I discovered that whomever keeps posting it is actually conflating two different independent things: Glass-Steagall's repeal allowed commercial banks to also do business as investment banks (and eliminated the regulatory watchdogs that would've provided the oversight necessary to prevent customers' commercial bank assets from being used to fuel risky securities trading), and Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac growing too comfortable issuing subprime mortgages despite the clear risk of insolvency led to the housing market crash and the federal government subsequently placing them into conservatorship and the Federal Reserve buying a lot of their debt. In fact, the position that Clinton should never have repealed Glass-Steagall is actually the left-wing position (Glass-Steagall was FDR/New Deal legislation. I thought right-wingers hated FDR?)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1235165 here againAlso, Glass-Steagall's repeal was with Republicans controlling both houses of Congress at the time. Clinton was trying to work across the aisle to show he was willing to collaborate with Republicans
Anonymous
>>1235125 no, I gave it to a gun rights group
>>1235165 obongo blamed the repeal of glass steagall for the 2008 financial collapse. the other part of it was the democrats and jews trying to destroy white towns/schools by filling white towns with blacks and illegals who had no jobs. Dems are still doing that now, see obongo and brandon trying to ship illegals to small towns in red states and the mayors of NYC and chicago trying to deport illegals to surrounding red towns.
Anonymous
>>1235184 >obongo blamed the repeal of glass steagall for the 2008 financial collapse That doesn't refute anything that I said. Repealing Glass-Steagall played a role in allowing commercial banks access to customers' assets to place risky bets with securities, with minimal regulation, that ended up backfiring. You realize the housing crash wasn't the only component of the Great Recession, right?
>rest of post /pol/tard/Stormfront/Daily Stormer-tier schizobabble.
Anonymous
>>1235193 then how do you explain giving loans to blacks and hispanics who had no job or assets? how do you explain how obgongo and biden keep trying to send illegals and "refugees" to red towns/states? how do you explain why the mayors of nyc and chicago are trying to deport all the illegals to surrounding red towns, faggot?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1235200 The burden is on you to substantiate your claim that it is an anti-white conspiracy cooked up by Democrats/Jews.
Anonymous
>>1235200 Where do you people get this shit from?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1235284 Facts and logic. You obviously wouldnt understand.