https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12754171/Former-editor-left-leaning-website-Recount-Slade-Sohmer-charged-multiple.html Former editor of left-leaning website The Recount, Slade Sohmer, is charged on multiple counts of child pornography
The former (homosexual) editor-in-chief of the left-leaning news website The Recount has been charged with multiple counts of child pornography.
Slade Sohmer, 44, is accused of possessing and distributing hundreds of child abuse material, including images depicting the rape of a child who was around four years old.
The Otis, Massachusetts, resident was arrested on Friday at his home after police obtained a search warrant for his devices.
He was released on Monday on $100,000 bail after pleading not guilty to two counts of possession of child pornography and two counts of dissemination of child pornography.
The journalist was ordered to have no access to the internet, engage in location notifications with a parole officer and avoid contact with minors.
Investigators said in court documents they found footage showing boys as young as four being raped and forced to perform oral sex acts by adults.
The probe reportedly started after the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children reportedly informed the Massachusetts State Policy Cyber Crime Unit that someone had shared a suspicious video on Snapchat in September, 2022.
Police say they then traced the IP address to Sohmer's home.
The Berkshire Eagle reported the footage showed an 11-year-old boy masturbating.
Sohmer was also allegedly filmed instructing a minor to perform sex acts.
He previously worked as a camp counselor for a nonprofit in New York, per his LinkedIn, which says he has worked as a co-director at Camp Power since 2010.
Sohmer was the head editor at The Recount for four years, until last month. He was removed from his position after the probe began, as reported by Fox News.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
He also had stints at Mic and SiriusXM radio and co-founded Hyper Vocal news site.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237155 >Slade Sohmer, 44, is accused of possessing and distributing hundreds of child abuse material, including images depicting the rape of a child who was around four years old. Why are Democrats like this?
Anonymous
>>1237155 >Take a guess Probably trying to shoot up people again.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237155 It was real all along, huh? Makes sense.
Anonymous
>>1237155 >only 15 years mandatory Castrate him and stick him in a cold box with a food tube, scum like this need to made an example of.
theonefag cantlickitsself
Quoted By:
>>1237155 >The former (homosexual) i'm a homo, and i like big penises, not little ones.
theonefag cantlickitsself
Quoted By:
>>1237181 why all this self loathing, anon?
Anonymous
>dailymail
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237155 >Former editor of left-leaning website The Recount, Slade Sohmer, is charged on multiple counts of child pornography Yes, and water is wet
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1237226 Where does it say this person is homosexual?
Anonymous
>>1237227 Don't ask /pol/lacks where their latent homosexual fantasies and projections come from. I don't think even they know.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I don't know why the OP image makes me laugh, but it does.
Anonymous
>>1237227 >Investigators said in court documents they found footage showing boys as young as four being raped and forced to perform oral sex acts by adults. Read the article, retard.
Although, 100% of child molesters are LGBTQ. So good call out.
Anonymous
>>1237231 >Although, 100% of child molesters are LGBTQ. So good call out. This is incorrect though? Lots are straight.
Are you ok?
Anonymous
>>1237233 >Lots are straight. 0% are straight. 100% are LGBTQ.
Anonymous
>>1237235 Do you have a peer-reviewed source to back that up?
Anonymous
>>1237235 There is no place on this planet where your observations and opinions of or about the world are valued.
Anonymous
>>1237237 Why would I need such a thing for an obvious fact?
Anonymous
>>1237240 Well, this comes directly from LGBTQ activists who state that homosexual men don't molest boys because chomos are their own sexuality.
Therefore, 100% of chomos are LGBTQ.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1237243 >And what about straight men molesting girls? Aberrant sexuality. LGBTQ.
Anonymous
>>1237244 So you're just making stuff up. Good to know. I accept your concession.
Anonymous
>>1237245 Nope it's true. Sorry you don't like facts.
Anonymous
>>1237247 You aren't stating "facts", you're stating your own deranged beliefs. Straight men molesting little girls are still straight. Why are you defending molesting little girls? Are you a pedophile yourself?
Anonymous
>>1237248 Sure I am. Look at the source posted earlier.
https://www.zeroabuseproject.org/victim-assistance/jwrc/keep-kids-safe/sexuality-of-offenders/ >"…[M]ost men who molest little boys are not gay. Only 21 percent of the child molesters we studied who assault little boys were exclusively homosexual. Nearly 80 percent of the men who molested little boys were heterosexual or bisexual and most of these men were married and had children of their own." LGBTQ. Once again. Sorry you don't like it, but it's true.
Anonymous
>>1237245 You have to understand that the modern /pol/ conceptualization of what LGBTQ means is "anything I think is bad is LGBTQ and anything I think is good is heterosexual". You have to treat them like children, anon. He isn't making stuff up. He's just actually that stupid.
Anonymous
>>1237252 I just showed you in the source above that most chomos are "straight". Therefore it's a sexuality that falls outside the norms of straight or gay and is LGBTQ.
You have no defense.
Anonymous
>>1237252 I wonder where these people are coming from. Reddit? Twitter? Literally facebook?
In any case they need to go back.
>>1237255 You still didn't address the point about straight men molesting little girls. Curious. Almost like you think that's a good thing.
I've seen you /pol/yps post about how it's "wife training", not grooming. You're revolting.
Anonymous
>>1237256 >I wonder where these people are coming from. Reddit? Twitter? Literally facebook? /pol/, usually. Its the only place dumb enough where guys like this seem normal.
Anonymous
>>1237256 >You still didn't address the point about straight men molesting little girls. Well considering that most men who molest boys are straight, once again, it's not an act based on sex of the victim and once again falls outside the norms or straight.
Once again, you have no defense. You posted the source that supports this. Why are you arguing the facts you've presented?
Anonymous
>>1237257 Muh /pol/. I've never seen this on /pol. I learned it from LGBTQ activist sites when trying to find out how many boys homosexuals molest by year.
There is no data because chomos aren't straight or gay, they're LGBTQ.
Anonymous
>>1237260 >I learned it from LGBTQ activist sites when trying to find out how many boys homosexuals molest by year. I sincerely doubt your ability to learn anything, anon.
>There is no data because chomos aren't straight or gay, they're LGBTQ. I don't know how to engage with this incoherent definition of LGBTQ you're using that nobody but you has heard of. Its like saying that guys who jack off into women's shoes are LGBTQ because "its outside the norm of straight or gay". You're not making any sense. I'm getting dumber just trying to read and comprehend your posts.
Anonymous
>>1237261 >I sincerely doubt your ability to learn anything, anon. Ad hom.
>I don't know how to engage with this incoherent definition of LGBTQ you're using that nobody but you has heard of. Its like saying that guys who jack off into women's shoes are LGBTQ because "its outside the norm of straight or gay". You're not making any sense. I'm getting dumber just trying to read and comprehend your posts. No argument.
Concession accepted.
Anonymous
>>1237262 >Ad hom Its not an ad hom. Its an insult. "I learned this thing that's wrong on an LGBTQ activist site" isn't an argument therefore it warrants no counter-argument.
>No argument The definition of LGBTQ is not "outside the norms of straight or gay". It isn't, straight, gay, then everything else is LGBTQ. You made all of that up. The definition of LGBTQ is literally in the name. Its an acronym. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer. None of those groupings have nothing to do with pedophilia. I don't know how to have a debate with someone who uses definitions to things that they made up in their head and nobody else has ever heard of.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237261 >Its like saying that guys who jack off into women's shoes are LGBTQ because "its outside the norm of straight or gay". Technically this paraphilia falls cleanly into the category of LGBTQ.
Anonymous
>>1237265 >queer Really? It's not a queer sexuality? Are you sure?
Because queer literally means no straight or gay, as chomos are as evidenced by the materials provided earlier in the thread.
I don't know why your can't wrap your feeble brain around the simple fact:
100% of chomos are LGBTQ.
Which you have backed up with supporting evidence yourself.
Anonymous
>>1237265 >Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer. None of those groupings have nothing to do with pedophilia. Queer theory is literally all about pedophilia and normalizing pedophilia.
For relevance:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-NseFg2kno Anonymous
Anonymous
I already debunked the "child molestation is inherently LGBTQ" guy in a previous thread, so bad in fact that he just derailed the thread with inane petty trolling. No need to relitigate the same arguments.
>>1234790 >>1234798 >>1234899 >>1234930 >>1234955 >>1234972 >>1234983 >>1234985 >>1234993 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237276 >I already debunked the "child molestation is inherently LGBTQ" guy in a previous thread, so bad in fact that he just derailed the thread with inane petty trolling. Nice cope. This isn't debunked. Another anon posted the evidence in this thread.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237276 And additionally you weren't arguing with me.
And even more you used examples of 17 and 20 year olds to muddy the waters. Peds hunt in the 0-12 range by definition.
A man sexually assaulting a 90 year old mentally disabled woman (like Chrichan did) would present itself as a queer sexuality if were sexually aroused specifically by that sort of paraphilia, otherwise it would exist as a simple sexual assault from a loser who couldn't get laid.
Everything you think you've disproven the simple fact that 100% of of chomos are LGBT is based entirely on a faulty understanding.
You have no argument.
Anonymous
>>1237276 And additionally you weren't arguing with me.
And even more you used examples of 17 and 20 year olds to muddy the waters. Peds hunt in the 0-12 range by definition.
A man sexually assaulting a 90 year old mentally disabled woman (like Chrischan did) would present itself as a queer sexuality if one were sexually aroused specifically by that sort of paraphilia, otherwise it would exist as a simple sexual assault from a loser who couldn't get laid (like Christranny).
Everything you've used to attempt to disprove the simple fact that 100% of chomos are LGBT is based entirely on a faulty understanding of what makes a chomo a chomo.
You have no argument. Read the source posted earlier.
Anonymous
>>1237271 >Queer theory is literally all about pedophilia and normalizing pedophilia. You need medication
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237279 >All chomos are LGBT based on this definition of LGBT that I just made up Go to bed, grandpa. This meme is never going to stick.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
what a surprise that he was cHoSeN
Anonymous
>>1237282 Good luck with your future anon, we're all rooting for you!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237297 Go to bed Ivan you have to get up and shill more in a few hours
Anonymous
>>1237259 It literally falls within the confines of straight as a definition. What the fuck are you on about?
Straight is codified as attracted to the opposite sex and gender. Pedophilia doesn’t make you not straight as a rule. Sexual deviancy doesn’t make you lgbt as a rule. Fetishes are considered sexual deviancy, but a huge number of them are engaged in by straight people. Pedophilia is one of them, though it is HUGELY immoral and extremely damaging to the victims’ lives.
Are you just trying to twist anything you don’t like into being part of the gay agenda or are you actually just retarded?
Either way, grab a stronger argument next time. Fucking pseud
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237265 What do you think the + stands for at the end? Its to cover all the other aberrations you faggots manifest into existence.
Anonymous
>>1237303 So you didn't read the source that was posted in the thread earlier?
Coping by simple denial is ridiculous.
If you had an ounce of brain matter you'd understand exactly what's going on here just by reading the source.
100% of chomos are LGBTQ.
Anonymous
>>1237323 More than 90% of abusers are people children know, love and trust. 30-40% of victims are abused by a family member. 50% are abused by someone outside of the family whom they know and trust. Evidence that a child has been sexually abused is not always obvious, and many children do not report that they have been abused
>1 out of every 4 girls is molested Anonymous
>>1237265 To be this fucking naive again
Anonymous
>>1237265 >LGBTQ is literally in the name. Its an acronym. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer. None of those groupings have nothing to do with pedophilia You purposely left out the +
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237393 >>1237388 How did you get this confused?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237256 You're conflating marrying women with actual molestation. Dishonest homo as expected
Anonymous
>>1237337 >>"…[M]ost men who molest little boys are not gay. Only 21 percent of the child molesters we studied who assault little boys were exclusively homosexual. Nearly 80 percent of the men who molested little boys were heterosexual or bisexual and most of these men were married and had children of their own." Once again, as already explained, this means that 100% of chomos are LGBTQ.
Anonymous
>>1237462 once again, more male family friends and uncles molest little girls in the family than anything. this is, as usual, extreme projection
Anonymous
>>1237468 So you still aren't able to grasp the point of why they are LGBTQ then, despite me using the source someone else provided that was intended to disprove this simple fact?
Is this a situation where you simply can't believe that the LGBTQ religion could have people who don't pass the purity test for you?
Go back. Read. Understand what you're reading. It's not hard.
Quit attempting the same argument that has already been debunked.
Anonymous
>>1237469 trying too hard/10
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237227 >>1237228 >where does it say this person is homosexual One would assume that a male who has a boyfriend is gay:
https://twitter.com/AndySwan/status/1725944485845119094 Anonymous
>>1237471 >>1237468 There's no way you guys are still arguing with this schizo
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237161 he's a lefty, so its always CP, rape or embezzlement with them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237527 Schizos argue for LGBTQ being a healthy lifestyle BTW.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
such an afactual hill for poltards to die on
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237250 >little boys >not girls I accept your concession
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237269 'queer' has a nebulous meaning that changes depending on who you talk to. what you probably mean is 'paraphilia'. all chomos are paraphilic, not LGBTABZ
>but anon! those are paraphilias! they are one and the same! sort of but not quite. its sort of like the squares and rectangles analogy, where only one word is a catch-all term that includes the other
>but anon! that's what the '+' means! that's really up to individual interpretation. a less optimistic man might assume that 'pedophilia' has been left out of the acronym to avoid pissing people off.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1237462 >"Most child molesters aren't actually gay." >SEE?!? THIS IS PROOF THAT THEY ARE GAY this is what you sound like.
