[432 / 1 / 1]
Quoted By: >>1308801 >>1308806 >>1308816 >>1308818 >>1308845 >>1308894 >>1308903 >>1309029 >>1309034 >>1309044 >>1309047 >>1309054 >>1309055 >>1309057 >>1309069 >>1309087 >>1309131 >>1309137 >>1309151 >>1309269 >>1309345 >>1309351 >>1309557
The Republican Judges finally decided to codify Nixon's 'When the President does it, it's not illegal'
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/scotus-rules-trump-immune_n_662be328e4b0ab66ede48949?zw
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has found Donald Trump enjoys complete immunity for clearly “official acts” he took while in office and at least “presumptive immunity” for other official acts as president. The decision, which was 6-3 along ideological lines, did not grant immunity for unofficial acts.
The opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts and agreed to by the other five conservative justices, finds that Trump has immunity for conduct involving officials solely within his own administration but not necessarily for actions involving state officials and people not in government.
“First, with respect to any criminal conduct relating to a President’s ‘core constitutional powers’ — those subjects ‘within his “conclusive and preclusive” constitutional authority’ — the President is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution,” the opinion says.
It found he has no immunity at all for actions that are not “official.”
It sent the case back to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to determine which actions alleged in the indictment constitute “official” actions for which he has immunity to make sure prosecutors cannot use evidence obtained regarding that conduct. The lower court is ordered to review, among other things, “whether a prosecution involving Trump’s alleged attempts to influence the Vice President’s oversight of the certification proceeding [on Jan. 6] would pose any dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”
The Supreme Court also sent one part of the case — Trump’s pressure on state-level officials and campaign aides to create fraudulent slates of Electoral College electors in states he had, in fact, lost — back to the Washington, D.C., appeals court to determine whether that conduct was “official.”
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/scotus-rules-trump-immune_n_662be328e4b0ab66ede48949?zw
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has found Donald Trump enjoys complete immunity for clearly “official acts” he took while in office and at least “presumptive immunity” for other official acts as president. The decision, which was 6-3 along ideological lines, did not grant immunity for unofficial acts.
The opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts and agreed to by the other five conservative justices, finds that Trump has immunity for conduct involving officials solely within his own administration but not necessarily for actions involving state officials and people not in government.
“First, with respect to any criminal conduct relating to a President’s ‘core constitutional powers’ — those subjects ‘within his “conclusive and preclusive” constitutional authority’ — the President is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution,” the opinion says.
It found he has no immunity at all for actions that are not “official.”
It sent the case back to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to determine which actions alleged in the indictment constitute “official” actions for which he has immunity to make sure prosecutors cannot use evidence obtained regarding that conduct. The lower court is ordered to review, among other things, “whether a prosecution involving Trump’s alleged attempts to influence the Vice President’s oversight of the certification proceeding [on Jan. 6] would pose any dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”
The Supreme Court also sent one part of the case — Trump’s pressure on state-level officials and campaign aides to create fraudulent slates of Electoral College electors in states he had, in fact, lost — back to the Washington, D.C., appeals court to determine whether that conduct was “official.”
