https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/sep/15/go-woke-go-broke-not-true-for-brands-says-global-advertising-study The cringe factor can be high when an established brand suddenly aligns itself with up-to-date values. It did not appear to work well for Gillette, which suffered a public backlash five years ago to its “toxic masculinity” advert, or for Marks and Spencer when it brought out an LGBT rainbow- coloured sandwich to mark Pride.
But new academic research carried out for the advertising industry suggests that “Go woke, go broke”, the snappy catchphrase devised by rightwing groups as a warning to brands, has got it all wrong.
It seems even clunky attempts to tune into newer, more tolerant values can give a product an advantage.
On Monday the findings of a global study from the Unstereotype Alliance, a business initiative convened by UN Women, will offer new evidence that advertising campaigns that are more inclusive have a positive impact on profits, sales and brand worth.
The analysis was conducted by researchers from the Saïd Business School at Oxford University using data collected by a group of large businesses, including Diageo, Kantar and Unilever, in collaboration with the Geena Davis Institute, set up by the US actor and activist to study gender in the media.
It found that when an advert can authentically and positively portray a full range of people – devoid of stereotypes – it can provide an edge in the marketplace when it comes to consumer preferences and long-term sales figures.
Based on analysis of 392 brands across 58 countries, the research, which claims to be the first of its kind, indicates the positive impact of inclusive advertising on outcomes, with an almost 3.5% boost to shorter-term sales and a more than 16% increase in the longer term.
It seems to persuade 62% of buyers to choose a product and make 15% of shoppers more loyal.
Anonymous
The study covered different product categories such as confectionery, snacks, personal care, beauty, pet food, pet care, alcohol, consumer healthcare and household products, across a variety of geographies. “The idea that inclusive advertising content can commercially damage a business has limited progress for too long,” said Sara Denby, head of the Unstereotype Alliance secretariat at UN Women. She added: “The assertion is consistently unfounded – but we needed to provide evidence to the contrary. This irrefutable data should reassure any business and encourage brands to renew their commitment to inclusivity in all forms, to not only benefit the communities they serve but also to drive growth and financially prosper.” The alliance, which was launched in 2017 and has 240 member companies, aims to stop harmful stereotypes in advertising. It also has 12 national chapters across five continents that combat culturally nuanced stereotypes. But the task of charting a promotional course through changing – and sometimes competing – modern values and sympathies is tricky. Burger King was forced to remove an ad that showed people trying to eat burgers with large chopsticks, while the public images of both the reality TV star Kendall Jenner and Pepsi were assumed to have been damaged by a campaign for the soft drink that capitalised on the Black Lives Matter movement. It featured the American model stopping a protest by handing a police officer a can. The beer brand Bud Light also had to deal with a commercial backlash in the US last year when it launched a campaign featuring the trans star Dylan Mulvaney. And one of the most famous early missteps in this direction was taken by Italian fashion brand Benetton, which shocked consumers in the 1990s with large billboards showing graphic scenes, including child labour, armed conflict and an electric chair. The campaigns attracted much attention but were not thought to have had any business benefit.
Anonymous
Chuds will never define woke.
if it walks talks fucks like a duck
>>1343511 I can't define porn, but I know it when I see it
Anonymous
>>1343514 You can't define porn?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343522 Admittedly the line between porn and smut is blurry when it comes to written works.
Also still works can be more artistic in nature even if they show explicit sex acts.
And even with comics and films, an explicit focus on something other than sexual gratification or presenting a sex act in a different enough light can make it pass from porn into another genre.
As an example, I don't think anyone would consider a facehugger throatfucking a dude and depositing its egg in his stomach to be porn absent a specific attempt to reframe it as such.
Anonymous
>>1343511 You don't need to define woke to make fun of woke when another woke slop game/movie flops
Also you have to do is make jokes and wait for the horde of crybaby leftoids coming to respond with ITS NOT WOKE SCIENCE WOKE IS PROFITABLE REEEEEEEEEE
Anonymous
>>1343511 Troons will never define what a woman is
Anonymous
>>1343514 >Woke is whatever I feel like it is Incorrect.
>>1343607 Woke is woke when it flops or when I make fun of it
Incorrect.
>>1343612 >Non-sequitur Incorrect.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343508 >UN Research on UN backed policy. I wonder if it's a glowing review of UN policies.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343622 >angry troon noises Don't worry, just wait for Season 2 of The Acolyte to make you feel be- oh...
Maybe you can play some Concord to calm do- ohhhh...
Anonymous
>Hazbin Hotel: a LGBT musical so successful and critically acclaimed, A24 & Amazon greenlit a second season barely into the first. Prime ensured that created by bisexual animator Vivienne Medrano went beyond a mere pilot >Guilty Gear: a video game franchise so popular, that company did more than just Strive when they made Bridget a trans woman. Still sells well >Inside Out 2: making $1.68 billion, thus the most successful animated movie of all time That which will never be a man makes angry noises at that which Goes Woke Breaking Bigots' Opinions.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343659 Imagine being so fully invested in this gay shit you sit around promoting it.
What a fag.
Anonymous
>>1343511 "Woke" is a term used to describe people who place a disproportionate value on social causes, particularly causes having to do with race, racism, representation and egalitarianism.
To define oneself as "woke" is to be a supporter of typically far left political movements, such as Black Lives Matter or Just Stop Oil. Those who are "woke" are also typically opposed to political movements that are not far left.
A common criticism of "woke" people and movements is that they miss the forest for the trees; that is to say that favoring racial issues over more tangible issues like the economy is not practical and does not resonate with the larger voting population.
This is the definition I like to use.
I hate all this culture war crap.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Amazon and Arc System Works more than fully investing in and promoting successful things which makes those that will never be men seethe?:>gay >fag Having such intrusive thoughts that it proves they're obsessed about such? Weird.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1343511 Concord and dustborn are peak examples of woke, and those two games were the biggest flop in human history.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Guilty Gear Strive: Bridget a trans woman. Poison before then >Overwatch: Tracer. Soldier 76 Two examples of games that continue to not be flops and cause peak seething in rightards. Subhuman opinions are history.
Anonymous
>>1343670 >This is the definition I like to use do it in 20 words or less
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343511 It's a leftist term that's been turned around and used against you; but you already new that.
Besides, it's been defined to you every time you "ask", but you just go off elsewhere and say "it's never been defined hurrrrr"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
When a picture can say more than just one word:
https://i.postimg.cc/HxxMMvkB/woke.jpg Or 'Woke' defined in just four words: 'What I don't like'.
Anonymous
>>1343714 Is 21 words the limit for liberal brains?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343714 >>1343511 >White men bad! >Men in dresses are women! that's basically what woke means
Anonymous
>>1343752 >muh liberals I'm just saying be concise, the 'definition that you like' sounds like something ben shapiro would say
Anonymous
>>1343670 That's a pretty reasonable take. Thank you!
Anonymous
>>1343755 >muh ben shapiro Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343695 If you think Concord's failure is because it's woke, you suffer from genuine brain damage.
Anonymous
>>1343508 >On Monday the findings of a global study from the Unstereotype Alliance, a business initiative convened by UN Women So a garbage, biased study, got it.
Anonymous
It's kind of amazing how they feel the need to damage control away this story.
Anonymous
>>1343769 Yes, your Ben Shapiro.
Anonymous
>>1343782 >So a garbage, biased study What exactly in the data is garbage and biased? Pretend like you're in the 4th grade and show your work.
>>1343804 Conspiracy brain is a house of cards. As soon as one card is compromised the rest are primed to fall. Conspiracytards can't give ground on even the tiniest thing because they use one singular lens of analysis to process the whole world. If one of their dumbfuck conspiracy talking points ends up not being true it threatens the ten million other dumbfuck conspiracy talking points they arrived to using the same faulty logic. Its sunk cost fallacy - all or nothing.
Anonymous
>>1343806 >Conspiracy brain is a house of cards. As soon as one card is compromised the rest are primed to fall. Conspiracytards can't give ground on even the tiniest thing because they use one singular lens of analysis to process the whole world. If one of their dumbfuck conspiracy talking points ends up not being true it threatens the ten million other dumbfuck conspiracy talking points they arrived to using the same faulty logic. Its sunk cost fallacy - all or nothing I guess this explains why you conspiracytards continue to claim Ryan Routh was a Republican hired by Trump as part of a PR tactic.
Makes sense.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343508 >All capeshit, sequels, and remakes Grim.
Anonymous
>>1343824 >I guess this explains why you conspiracytards continue to claim Ryan Routh was a Republican hired by Trump as part of a PR tactic. You're arguing with a man that lives in your head. Does it make you uncomfortable to engage with real life people or are you only confident with strawmen?
Anonymous
>>1343842 very very underrated comment lmao
Anonymous
>>1343842 He actually posts on this board, not in my head.
Anonymous
>>1343842 >>1343853 >>1343861 Huh. Lefty fag on this board did claim he was a Republican hired by Trump
>>1342828 imagine that.
schizo /news/troons lose again
Anonymous
>>1343863 >Huh. Lefty fag on this board did claim he was a Republican hired by Trump >>1342828 imagine that. Sounds like you should go argue with him then. I, however, said nothing of the sort. You're not engaging with me.
>>1343861 >He actually posts on this board, not in my head. Yet the throughline is that I am not him. I'm not sure why you'd; bring up someone else's argument when engaging with me. That's called strawmanning.
Anonymous
>>1343885 >Sounds like you should go argue with him then. I, however, said nothing of the sort. You're not engaging with me. That probably is you, queer.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343886 >That probably is you, queer. But it isn't. You're so incapable of engaging with my argument you have to invent my opinion for me and argue with that instead. Absolutely pathetic.
Anonymous
>>1343508 >a global study from the Unstereotype Alliance, a business initiative convened by UN Women surely this will be entirely unbiased research
Anonymous
>>1343915 >surely this will be entirely unbiased research If you have any evidence that the research is biased or inaccurate feel free to provide it.
Anonymous
>>1343921 sure, here you go:
>from the Unstereotype Alliance, a business initiative convened by UN Women Anonymous
>>1343924 So you have no evidence that the data they provided is biased or inaccurate. You have a gut feeling that the initiative as a whole may be biased but you can't substantiate that in any way. Got it.
Anonymous
>>1343927 See this anon knows what's going on.
It's like when the cigarette companies funded research that showed with science that cigarettes don't cause cancer.
Why would the cigarette companies lie?
There's zero motive there. Nothing was ever suspect.
Anonymous
>>1343933 Except in that case, other researchers were able to show in studies that the fake research put out by cigarette companies was wrong, and other researchers weren't able to replicate the bad results.
People that aren't disingenuous faggots debunk things with data, not their feelings. Either prove the study wrong, or find another study that claims the opposite.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343935 People who are actual human beings with souls and not mindless bugmen can form their own thoughts instead of parroting consensus by committee or whatever their globalist technocrat overlords told them to think
Anonymous
>>1343508 The problem are socialists infecting schools, colleges and universities. The education system must be cleansed from the woke disease by cutting its budget to nothing.
Anonymous
The problem is rightists infecting society. It must be cleansed from that disease by denying them of their right to infect society.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343951 i love going to schools and universities so that i dont have to think for myself, i want to be educated so that i can parrot preexisting widely accepted conservative ideologies. the woke education institutes ran by the sociaists that teaches its students to actually think are too dangerous, some of them might start saying such radical things like "treating minorities as subhumans are not good"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343760 You're welcome anon. I hope you have a good rest of your day.
>>1343714 I don't think I can, honestly. It's a pretty loaded term
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343805 Hey don't take my Ben Shapiro, I paid for it, it's mine
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343935 So has anyone but the UN studied the UN to see if the UN is providing fake research about the effectiveness of the UN?
No? OK. There you go, queertard.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343959 You don't even cleanse your own ass, how are you gonna cleanse society?
Stinky
Anonymous
^There's some intrusive thoughts>ass >Stinky Weird
Anonymous
>>1344072 >weird >weird >weird Troon.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
There's the rightard with intrusive thoughts about those it is obsessed about because it is psychologically insecure, yet those who are psychologically secute don't need to so much as think about what the rightard always has in its head 24/7:>Troon Weird
Anonymous
There's the rightard with intrusive thoughts about those it is obsessed about because it is psychologically insecure, yet those who are psychologically secure don't need to so much as think about what the rightard always has in its head 24/7:>Troon Weird
Anonymous
>>1343511 https://www.thefp.com/p/what-happens-when-doctors-cant-speak ‘Whole Areas of Research Are Off-Limits’ “Wokeness feels like an existential threat,” a doctor from the Northwest said. “In health care, innovation depends on open, objective inquiry into complex problems, but that’s now undermined by this simplistic and racialized worldview where racism is seen as the cause of all disparities, despite robust data showing it’s not that simple.” “Whole research areas are off-limits,” he said, adding that some of what is being published in the nation’s top journals is “shoddy as hell.” Here, he was referring in part to a study published last year in the Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences. The study was covered all over the news, with headlines like “Black Newborns More Likely to Die When Looked After by White Doctors” (CNN), “The Lack of Black Doctors is Killing Black Babies” (Fortune), and “Black Babies More Likely to Survive when Cared for by Black Doctors” (The Guardian). Despite these breathless headlines, the study was so methodologically flawed that, according to several of the doctors I spoke with, it’s impossible to extrapolate any conclusions about how the race of the treating doctor impacts patient outcomes at all. And yet very few people were willing to publicly criticize it. As Vinay Prasad, a clinician and a professor at the University of California San Francisco, put it on Twitter: “I am aware of dozens of people who agree with my assessment of this paper and are scared to comment.” “It’s some of the most shoddy, methodologically flawed research we’ve ever seen published in these journals,” the doctor in the Zoom meeting said, “with sensational conclusions that seem totally unjustified from the results of the study.” “It’s frustrating because we all know how hard it is to get good, sound research published,” he added. “So do those rules and quality standards no longer apply to this topic,
Anonymous
>>1344081 Faggety-spaghetti.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1344118 yes we know african americans moisten your rectum
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>didn't read because it can't read. it's an illiterate subhuman
Anonymous
>>1343508 because far-left retards don't understand what people mean when they say woke to the point you have absolute brainlets thinking baldur's gate 3 is "woke" because it has ze options.
Anonymous
>>1343508 that's study is retarded though. It needs to study the after effects of woke. Like for example how everything star wars now loses money due to it having a reputation for being woke poisoned.
This study is attempting to paper over the full effects by ignoring them.
Anonymous
>>1344212 Does Star Wars suck now because it has terrible writing and the fact that Disney declared 40 years worth of Expanded Universe backstory to be non-canon? Or does it suck now because the sequel trilogy has a black reformed Stormtrooper, a woman main protagonist, and an Asian woman supporting character?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343659 Inside Out 2 wasn't, IN ANY WAY, woke.
Unless you count made up emotions being made into characters.
I'm sure you're familiar.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1344223 it sucks because garbage writers are trying to compensate for their lack of writing skills by implementing a trans female black indian asian mixed heritage character so they have an excuse when the series flops because of le racists and definitely not being of lack of writing skills. Its woke because the writers are talentless losers who want an excuse
Anonymous
Everything subhuman rightards don't like is 'Woke' to them:
https://i.postimg.cc/HxxMMvkB/woke.jpg That which makes them seethe or they would never so much as think about such and not have opinions about? I'm glad that things rightards consider 'Woke' exist which make them perma-seethe and live rent free in their heads 24/7. And there's less than fuck all these rightard snowflakes can do about it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1344236 nice strawman loser, but i guess retarded leftists can't argue any other way huh.
Anonymous
Those that think the recent Star Wars movies are 'Woke'?>a camp-sounding droid that says the first words in the film that started it all >A Sith Lord with the voice of a recently passed away black man >a woman who can handle herself against a torture droid and Imperial Stormtroopers >A furry. And a teddy bear >A black man that ultimately leads the attack against the second Death Star That is why you fail.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1344243 >ignores main character is written as an obnoxious mary stu. I'm sorry you're so uneducated
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>strawman All those who think Nicolas Cage can do no wrong: to them there is no such thing as an actual 'bad' Nicolas Cage movie>The Wicker Man >the Christopher Lee role in the 1973 original played in this 2006 remake by a woman, Ellen Burstyn So it's not only this straw man that wins. As does the fact that to rightards 'Woke' = anything they don't like. And any rightards that think otherwise are eternally wrong. But then, all rightards are by definition more than wrong in everything they say, do & think due to the fact they're rightards. And there's still less than fuck all they can do about that which lives in their heads rent free and makes these rightard snowflakes perma-seethe.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1344209 Maybe it's because rightoids don't even know what woke is either? It's literally just a catchphrase they use when they don't like something because it has gays or black people in it, which they can immediately backtrack and claim it wasn't woke actually when the whole idea of "Go woke, go broke" conflicts with reality
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343508 A snappy right wing catchphrase was a lie the whole time? Impossible!
Anonymous
>Inside Out 2 wasn't, IN ANY WAY, woke >>1343452 One of the above is wrong. Choose wisely.
>Inside Out 2 is the biggest animated movie of all time at $1.682 billion Go Woke, Break A 'Meme'.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Woke is anti white, anti male, anti straight. “Put a chic in it and make it gay”
Anonymous
>>1343508 >>1344458 >study done by the UN's woman's something or other so it was a propaganda piece not based on reality because the UN is controlled by jewish bankers who hate white people
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1344491 Take your schizophrenia medications before posting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343508 >Geena Davis Institute Research sucking jew cock.
Bud Light - ruined.
Gillette - ruined
These people got rekt. The cannot unload flagship brands. It's desparation.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1343509 >inclusive advertising content You can reframe all you want but you targeted white males, portrayed them as dumb, the told their wives, "don't buy unilever, dont buy InBev« the real truth is you are only profitable on the last 15% of sales volume, if you lose that 10-15٪ you are not profitable at all. Worse is your competitors fill in the demand and it is very expensive to claw backyour market share. Then you find out that even when you increase advertising, it is not as effective. Price discounting has less impact too. Then retailers say your product is a slow mover and increase your slotting allotmemt. That's what happens tranny. t. Marketing MBA
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Here i'll define woke in 2 words : Oikophobic soboteur.