https://www.sanangelolive.com/news/politics/2024-09-23/anti-darby-pac-spokesmans-lewd-past-exposed https://www.advocate.com/people/corey-deangelis-gay-adult-films Corey DeAngelis, a conservative education reform advocate who has espoused anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments, has been exposed for his past involvement in gay adult films. The revelation has triggered widespread accusations of hypocrisy online, given DeAngelis’ long-standing public stance against LGBTQ+ rights and inclusion.
DeAngelis, a self-described “school choice evangelist,” is a senior fellow at the American Federation for Children and a frequent Fox News contributor. His career has primarily focused on promoting school choice and criticizing public education for allegedly indoctrinating children with “woke” ideologies, including support for LGBTQ+ rights. However, it has now emerged that as recently as 2014, DeAngelis performed in gay adult films under the pseudonym “Seth Rose,” including a scene in which he won a group masturbation contest.
The revelations, first reported by
StraightUpGayPorn.com , have ignited a firestorm of criticism.
Matt Bernstein, a prominent LGBTQ+ activist, took to X (formerly Twitter) to share the news, writing, “just learned this anti-lgbtq school reform guy does gay porn,” in a post that quickly went viral.
DeAngelis has gone silent on social media and has not responded to The Advocate’s requests for comment. The Advocate has not been able to independently confirm that DeAngelis is the person who appeared in the adult films, but The Advocate compared images and audio of DeAngelis with Rose. Our analysis of the clips suggests they are the same.
The Advocate contacted a representative of Blurred Media Inc., the parent company of the adult film studio that produced the content, but did not receive a response.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Before the adult film revelations, DeAngelis had carved out a prominent role within conservative circles as a leading advocate for school choice, a policy that allows parents to select the educational setting for their children rather than being limited to public schools in their district. School choice encompasses a range of mechanisms, including voucher programs that fund private school tuition, charter schools, education savings accounts, and tax-credit scholarships. However, critics, including public education advocates, have long argued that school choice diverts necessary funding from public schools, leaves disadvantaged students behind, and contributes to greater inequality in the education system. DeAngelis is a senior fellow at multiple think tanks, including the Reason Foundation and the Cato Institute, and is the executive director of the Educational Freedom Institute. DeAngelis has regularly appeared on Fox News and other conservative media outlets, where he has railed against public schools for what he claims is an overemphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, including those that support LGBTQ+ students. DeAngelis also courted controversy recently when he promoted a post by Republican U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, which criticized the Biden-Harris administration for allegedly pushing “woke ideologies” in schools. Johnson’s post included a graphic that claimed the “Radical Left’s 2024 Weekly Lesson Plan” for schools consisted of topics like Critical Race Theory, Drag Queen Story Hour, mandatory pronoun recognition, “boys participating in girls’ sports,” and pro-Hamas protests. DeAngelis quote-tweeted Johnson’s message: “It’s time to pass the Educational Choice for Children Act. School choice defeats the woke mind virus.”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
DeAngelis is scheduled to speak at a right-wing conference in Washington, D.C., on Sunday, Sept. 29. The event, titled “Rescue The Republic,” will feature a lineup of anti-LGBTQ+ extremists, including Moms for Liberty co-founder Tiffany Justice and other far-right figures such as Charlie Kirk, Jordan Peterson, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In a July 2023 appearance on Fox News, DeAngelis expressed outrage at the California superintendent of public instruction’s opposition to a school district’s policy to outtransgender students to their parents. “It’s really disgusting,” DeAngelis said, “We have some people here today in 2023 fighting to keep sexual secrets from parents when it comes to their own children. It’s absolutely ridiculous.” He praised the Chino Valley Unified School District board for informing parents, saying, “Freedom can ring even in Communist California, a deep blue state.” During another Fox News appearance this year, DeAngelis criticized LGBTQ+ inclusion efforts, claiming they overshadowed basic education. “They’re focused more on the LGBTs than the ABCs,” he said. “They want to indoctrinate your kids, not educate them.” Around the country, the American Civil Liberties Union is tracking more than 500 anti-LGBTQ+ education bills in 2024. DeAngelis is not the only conservative figure facing recent accusations of hypocrisy. Last week, Mark Robinson, the Republican lieutenant governor of North Carolina and gubernatorial candidate, made headlines after it was revealed that he previously called himself a “Black Nazi” and admitted to enjoying transgender pornography, despite his long history of anti-transgender rhetoric. Robinson has also been accused of promoting Holocaust denial and expressing support for reinstating slavery.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
GLAAD president and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis highlighted DeAngelis’s hypocrisy in a statement to The Advocate. “Corey DeAngelis is yet another public figure whose anti-LGBTQ extremism already makes him deeply unqualified to be an expert in improving safety and education at school,” she said. “The latest news on DeAngelis further reveals his baseless, hypocritical attempt to profiteer and score political points. DeAngelis is a sideshow charlatan. The real threat is from the people who’ve propped him up and their Project 2025 blueprint for a government takeover that would demolish the Department of Education and refuse to recognize rising LGBTQ visibility and acceptance across society.”
Anonymous
>>1345918 Why do conservatives hate public schooling so much? And why are private for-profit schools the answer?
Anonymous
>>1345924 Just a guess, but it's probably because they're shit. You'd be better off handing the kids the $18k a year you piss away on them once they turn 18.
Anonymous
>>1345918 >Anti-gay activist discovered to secretly be a gay porn actor Those who shout the loudest have the most to hide.
Making IMAX obsolete.
Accusations are Admissions.
By their hypocrisies shall they be destroyed.
Just ask very conservative Christian, member of Family Research Council and vociferously anti-gay Josh Duggar. But only after his 12 years in prison for possessing the worst CP in existence and being on the Sex Offenders Registry in perpetuity.
Proof that hypocrites never had the right to have opinions in the first place.
Anonymous
>>1345924 Because conservatives rely on stupid, sociopathic and/or uneducated people voting for them to keep them in power. Public education and responsible upbringing is the greatest threat to that.
Anonymous
>>1345928 There are, by far, more illiterate people voting democrat than there are republican.
Anonymous
>>1345926 So why not make the public schools better instead of turning them over to the profit-minded private sector?
Anonymous
>>1345931 Ah, the known Democrat-favored states of Alabama, Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana.
Anonymous
>>1345935 I wonder what those states have in common.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345933 Not possible. Any government institution will inevitably be co-opted by loons more interested in teaching ideology than reading and mathematics.
Look at the schools now. Even ignoring the fags and leftists pushing their mental illnesses onto kids, you've got the current generation being taught by the illiterates of the last generation, who were taught by the first generation who wasn't taught to read using phonics. Hell, they're updating the ABC song because all the brown kids you've imported can't figure out that LMNOP isn't a single letter.
Damn shame, really, what your kind have done to education in this country.
Anonymous
>>1345937 old, entrenched power players (the "good 'ol boys") who think if you're the county dog catcher that means you're powerful and people should never question you and its fine if you treat the treasury like your own purse?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345918 As DeAngaylis has destroyed his own opinions on not only education, if that rightard represents the 'alternative', then it's impossible for that which he disagrees with to be wrong. He himself proves it can't be, so how's that for a paradox o bigots?
Anonymous
>>1345941 Yeah dude. It's the dog catcher's fault the black and brown kids can't read.
Anonymous
>>1345944 >keep black kids out of school for the first half of the 20th century >government says you can't do that >fight tooth and nail against it, come up with all kinds of ways to avoid integration >courts continue to say that's illegal >new plan >destroy public education system and divert funding to private schools >said private schools require "applications" and can decline a student for basically any reason short of outright saying they're black >as a side effect you keep the poor whites stupid too so that you can easily manipulate them you're right, its the entire southern conservative apparatus. I remember when Texas moved to get rid of critical thinking skills as a goal to be taught to students. how do you think people get to be so dumb and malleable? here's just one example that charts the history pretty well:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/17/478389720/after-50-year-legal-struggle-mississippi-school-district-ordered-to-desegregate Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345937 >New Hampshire and Minnesota are the most literate states in the country >White as snow >Also solid blue states Well, it's not educated whites, that's for sure.
Anonymous
>>1345924 public schooling is not in the bill of rights, so don't care
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>i'm a free thinking man, an individual who believes that we ought to be a nation of individuals working for our own self interest >I believe whatever is on the list is good and whatever isn't on the list is bad, simple as which is it anon?
Anonymous
>>1345971 >investing public money in the nation's children is bad Why are you like this?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345924 Because public schools are paid for by taxes, are (legally speaking) subject to equal treatment of all students regardless of demographic background, are subject to separation of church and state, etc. All things right-wingers hate.
Anonymous
>>1345973 schools are literally an outdated bad idea that is superseded by the fact you can learn pretty much anything browsing the internet nowadays
Anonymous
>>1345979 Even if that was true (which it isn't), how would turning schools over to corporations make it any better?
Anonymous
>>1345965 Your species is mind numbingly stupid.
Anonymous
>>1345980 i don't get to tell you what is "better" or not, that's an individual subjective normative claim, public schooling however forces people to pay them even if you don't send your kids there, private schools don't force you to pay them, i choose the options that doesn't force me to do stuff
Anonymous
>>1345988 We live in a society.
Anonymous
>>1345986 Would you care to explain why you think it's stupid or let your juvenescent attempt at an insult stand on its own?
Anonymous
>>1345990 you know what i said is perfectly reasonable and you even agree with it even if you won't admit it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345996 chud headcanon is so weird
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345988 I choose the option that ensures the people I have to interact with on a daily basis won't be numbskulls who think reading a few blogs and watching a few youtube videos means they know more than people who dedicate their lives to scholarship, even if it means my tax bill is a few bucks higher
Anonymous
>>1345986 same species as you bud, though it makes me shudder to think we share any dna in common
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345990 >We live in a society And hypocries such as DeAngaylis get what they fucking deserve
Anonymous
>>1345992 You're right dude. Black kids can't read today because their grandparents lived through segregation.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346008 Nah. Leftists are an offshoot species and a genetic dead end.
Anonymous
>>1346014 >didn't bother to read the linked npr article >>1345965 tl;dr as of 2016 federal courts were still ordering desegregation in places that keep not doing it or desegregating
Anonymous
>>1346020 >tl;dr as of 2016 federal courts were still ordering desegregation in places that keep not doing it or desegregating You think this is a zinger because you're not smart enough to differentiate between de jure and de facto school segregation.
>Republicans R dumb Dont make me whip out the Pew data. On average we're better educated and earn more.
Anonymous
>>1346024 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614000373 This data? The one from ten years ago, before Trump? The one that says socially liberal beliefs correlate with intelligence? That one?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1346032 >no argument I accept your concession Rajesh, but your boss sure doesn't. Get ready for your whipping.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346033 >>no argument >Sciencedirect Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346029 >>1346033 The current conservative ethos is that higher education is a scam and an indoctrination factory and that the only real jobs are working with your hands like plumbers and welders. You really need a study to tell you that left leaning people have more formal education?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345979 Didn't you just beg the govt to ban tiktok a little while back? Lmao
Anonymous
>>1346020 Sure thing dude. I'm sure bussing those kids all over the place is going to do wonders for literacy rates everywhere.
Anonymous
>>1346089 Fags shouldn't be allowed in politics.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346140 No argument here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346140 >Fags shouldn't be allowed in politics So anyone who has anything to do with fags in politics shouldn't be allowed in politics themselves?
not that there's anything wrong with that
not that there's anything wrong with that Tue 24 Sep 2024 06:14:07 No. 1346294 Report >>1345927 He changed his degenerate life style. Good for him
Anonymous
>>1346294 Would you say that anyone who has anything to do with faggots in any way is a degenerate? Yes or No
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346296 Your mom is a degenerate. That's why you're a faggot.
Anonymous
>anti-gay activist is secretly a gay porn actor >oh wow- so he does both at the same time? >no, he used to do gay porn 10 years ago but got out of it and now is an activist against it >oh Hilarious that this thread devolved into leftists screeching about how they're more educated because they're in school more, despite them all collectively glazing over the fact that he hasn't done porn in over 10 years. Weird- Mia Khalifa does something similar in regards to speaking out about the porn industry and she's a darling to the left, in spite of the fact that she still runs an OF and refuses to give up her porn name. What a Freudian shitstorm. This is what happens to your brain on public education lmao
Anonymous
>>1346322 I don't think your Mia Khalifa example really fits. Mia Khalifa isn't anti-porn or anti-sex work, per se. She is anti-"the porn industry"; that is to say, she has issues with the exploitative and predatory nature of corporate professional studio porn, but I don't think she minds the democratization that amateur porn platforms like OF allow.
Anonymous
>>1346322 Genuinely didn't read a single word of what you wrote.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346294 >He changed his degenerate life style. Good for him Correct. He changed his lifestyle from being a gay degenerate porn actor to a gay degenerate porn actor who makes money grifting as a pick me for conservatives.
Anonymous
>>1346330 >democratization that amateur porn platforms like OF allow. People who honestly think the propagation of OF is a good thing should be shoot, ironically
>>1346417 Excessive porn consumption can lead to vision problems- you should get that looked at
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346439 >should be shoot Anonymous
>>1346439 What is wrong with sex workers/porn stars having ownership, a bigger share of profits, and agency over the content they create? As opposed to shooting studio porn, where the studio owns the content, pays the actresses jack shit, and subject them to less than favorable working conditions?
Anonymous
>>1346469 Porn is inherently terrible for you, stupid.
Anonymous
>>1346527 What does that have to do with the difference between how income is distributed via shooting studio porn vs doing OF? No one asked whether or not porn is good for you. Consenting adults can make a decision whether or not they want to consume porn, just as they can decide whether or not to consume other harmful things like alcohol or tobacco.
Anonymous
>>1346536 What does that have to do with porn being inherently terrible for you? Stop trying to normalize it by having a discussion about income distribution, coomer.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346538 The original claim (or inference) was that Mia Khalifa was a hypocrite for supposedly speaking out about the porn industry while continuing to use her porn stage name and running an OF account. My counterclaim was that Mia Khalifa was specifically critical of the corporate studio porn industry, but not of sex work in general or democratized amateur porn platforms like OF. Instead of engaging with what I said, you're just going "but porn is inherently bad because... IT JUST IS, OKAY?!"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1345924 LGBT shit and anti white racism.