https://www.newsweek.com/jd-vance-dossier-leak-hack-iran-ken-klippenstein-1960044 Ken Klippenstein, an independent journalist, was banned from Twitter, on Thursday after he published a dossier on Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) via his newsletter and promoted the link on the social media site owned by Elon Musk.
“Ken Klippenstein was temporarily suspended for violating our rules on posting unredacted private personal information, specifically Sen. Vance’s physical addresses and the majority of his Social Security number,” a post from Twitter read.
The dossier is a 271-page research paper that the Donald Trump campaign had apparently compiled to properly vet Vance, now Trump’s running mate.
According to the Trump campaign, the Iranian government allegedly hacked the campaign. An anonymous sender emailed the dossier to several media outlets, but the outlets did not publish it.
In a follow-up post on his newsletter, Klippenstein argued that he never shared any private information on Twitter; he just linked to it. He wrote, “The principle involved here is complex,” because Vance is an elected official and vice presidential candidate, but also because the private information is available for anyone to buy.
Klippenstein said it’s a “very funny end” to his time on the social media platform, but it’s also a “chilling effect on speech.”
“Not a single media organization was willing to publish a document that would have been a no-brainer during or prior to the heyday of Edward Snowden’s disclosures. That illustrates the dramatic shift in attitudes about what the news media thinks the public should know, and the role the mainstream plays in steadily ceding that territory to the national security threat machine. Media’s job, I believe, is to push back against these various forms of censorship.”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The dossier includes everything from Vance’s “potential vulnerabilities,” his past criticisms of Trump, and his criminal, police, voting and lobbying records. Musk, who called himself a “free speech absolutist,” bought Twitter and changed its name to X in 2022. Since then, he has banned journalists who have negatively reported on him and his companies.
Anonymous
>>1346971 >Elon Musk Engages in Election Interference by Banning Journalist Who Published JD Vance Dossier Wait.
So Russia hacking the Hillary campaign and releasing documents is election interference.
But Iran hacking the Trump campaign and releasing documents is not election interference.
But ALSO Twitter banning someone for publishing someone's home address and social security number is election interference
Did I get it right?
Anonymous
>>1346978 So you're alright with censorship? Good to know.
Anonymous
>>1346978 >Did I get it right? Its hard to tell given that you're arguing with someone in your head.
Anonymous
>>1346979 No one cares what he does on his platform. It's not like the guy is being silenced, he's free to go to any other platform and say whatever he wants.
Anonymous
>>1346982 >No one cares Why do /pol/ppets always resort to this as their ast resort when they're cornered?
Anonymous
>>1346982 Its so weird how the conservative messaging flipped. It was "town square town square free speech town square" when conservatives weren't being favored but now that Elon Musk basically uses the platform as a right-wing AI misinformation factory and banning opposing political views the "town square" is nowhere to be found. There's literally no more room in the memory hole for the amount of positions republicans have 180'd on now that it benefits them.
Anonymous
>>1346983 I'm not a /pol/ppet
>>1346984 I'm not a conservative. Twitter isn't the free speech forum you guys think it is, it's Elon's personal hugbox. Ken Klippenstein isn't being silenced and is free to appear on Oprah or Joe Rogan or whereever he wants.
Anonymous
>>1346979 >So you're alright with censorship? Dont dox people.
>>1346981 >you're arguing with someone in your head. >Elon Musk Engages in Election Interference by Banning Journalist Who Published JD Vance Dossier Anonymous
>>1346984 >It was "town square town square free speech town square" when conservatives weren't being favored but now that Elon Musk basically uses the platform as a right-wing AI misinformation factory and banning opposing political views the "town square" ?????
Had he not posted JD's home address and social security number his account would still be up. Simple as.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346971 Elon bends to the will of Brazil
Of his ego they've had their fill
So when at governments you whine
They'll say 'Ken Klippenstein'
And ban X? Of course they will
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346987 >Had he not posted JD's home address and social security number his account would still be up I didn't type this post in response to this singular story about Elon Musk and JD Vance. This is a summary of Elon's entire engagement with Twitter since he's purchased it. Since he's purchased it he's made a habit of banning and censoring journalists that are critical of him and his political ideology and using his account, the largest account on all of Twitter as an exclusively right-wing partisan misinformation repository. The whole point is not this one story about JD Vance. The point is the double standard - if Mark Zuckerberg had personally purchased Twitter, banned right-wing commentators who he didn't like and then used his 200 million follower account to repost AI misinformation about Trump and nothing but pro-left wing political propaganda conservatives would be fucking furious. When Twitter suppressed the story about Hunter Biden for ONE DAY while they were debating their leaked materials policy conservatives blew their stacks. They've been crying about it for the past 4 years. The double standard is quite obvious.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346971 >bans hate crime and fake news libshit complain ok maybe libshits should make their own social media platform if they want to spread hate and fakenews so much.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346984 hey retard remember when twitter was under libshit control " its a private company they can do whatever they want lololol"
you deserve it
Anonymous
>>1346985 >I'm not a... How to start off with a lie
Anonymous
>>1346986 Public information is not doxing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Or other governments follow Brazil's example after Musk bent over to them. X doesn't have the right to exist in China, so who's right: Xi or Musk bending to CCP's will?>EU said Jump re. USB C in the iPhone 15 to a company superior to Tesla, Apple asked 'How high?' Governments can do whatever they want to X lololol. Elon deserves it.
Anonymous
>>1347020 What am I lying about?
Anonymous
>>1347025 That you're a /pol/ppet
it's my party and I'll cry if I want 2
it's my party and I'll cry if I want 2 Fri 27 Sep 2024 07:56:19 No. 1347052 Report >>1346985 Elon bought the baseball mitt. So when he gets triggered, he can take it and cancel the game and go home. So there
Anonymous
>>1347031 But I'm not lying. What now?
>>1347052 Exactly. No one is forcing people to post there, just like no one is preventing Ken from posting anywhere else but there.
Anonymous
>>1346971 >“Ken Klippenstein was temporarily suspended for violating our rules on posting unredacted private personal information, specifically Sen. Vance’s physical addresses and the majority of his Social Security number,” a post from Twitter read. yes, that's illegal. It is illegal to post privacy act information without permission.
Anonymous
>>1347056 This is just going to be streisand effected
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347057 no retard. Ken redacts the personal information and then releases it again.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346971 Build your own twatter.
Anonymous
>>1347021 Home addresses and social security numbers are not public information.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347056 all that info is publicly available online for free from official sources
Anonymous
>>1347055 You're lying again, now what?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347073 >Home addresses are not public information. DoesHeKnow?.jpeg
Also Vance's SS number was partially censored
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347073 for public officials with tax returns they must publicize, yes they are
Anonymous
>>1347073 >Home addresses [...] are not public information >what are phone books Anonymous
>>1347086 >phone books >having private addresses published Someone's too young to remember how phone books actually worked
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>muh free speech... Doxxing is free speech now? Fkn losers
Anonymous
>>1347088 Unless you went out of your way to pay whatever fee the local phone directory charged to keep your address from being published, they published your address. And anyone could look it up.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1347094 I am most likely older than you are.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347095 Sure you are, zoomer
Anonymous
Funny how Twitter and Facebook doesn’t stop MAGA thugs from publishing addresses and phone numbers of poll workers, judges, prosecutors, and their families when they are on the “other side”. But when it's Republican, they go full press to censor it.
Anonymous
>>1347079 nope, still not a /pol/ppet
>>1347106 Name 5 examples
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1347109 But I'm not lying, and in any case what does it matter if I was? Elon's hugbox is still going to be Elon's hugbox either way.
Anonymous
>>1347110 You're lying again, cut it out
Anonymous
>>1347111 Actually I'm not. But I'm willing to be patient with you because I know how the turboautists and schizos on this board can be. You've simply been talking with the boomers for too long. My point, however, still stands. Twitter is a private entity and can do whatever the fuck it wants now just like they could under Jack Dorsey in 2020.
Anonymous
>>1347112 Nah, you are still lying.
Anonymous
>>1347113 Well I'm sorry but you're incorrect.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347106 >muh freeze peach Anonymous
>>1347114 And you're still lying.
Anonymous
>>1347117 You have made a mistake.
Anonymous
>>1346978 Literally everyone's social security is public dumbass, there's no doxing occurring. Did you miss that massive database leak a month ago?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347122 Then reply to this post your name and social security number.
Anonymous
>>1346971 Election interference is a stretch since the document and the original url are still active. Musk, being the petty manchild he is, just blocked it on his site which he has the right to do. Asking the feds to censor the document and them actually doing it would be interference. He's not so much telling lies and spreading misinformation as he is hiding the truth. He is probably expecting something in return if trump/vance win and is courting them to get that favor. Democrats typically condemn him, so he doesn't bother with them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347088 Phone books were opt-out, not opt-in. Unless you opted out, the phone book published your address.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Build your own social media platform >it’s a private company >jannies are botched surgery trannys
Anonymous
>>1347126 Someone posted the document here for a news article and the thread was deleted
And facebook is banning links too.
This reeks of a cover up. Or at minimum reconfirms the massive conservative bias in the media.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347169 the media is run by businessmen after all
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347126 >Election interference is a stretch since the document and the original url are still active. True. Keep in mind that's the OP's title that he came up with on his own. The article doesn't use that wording.
>He's not so much telling lies and spreading misinformation as he is hiding the truth He absolutely spreads lies and misinformation. His account is riddled with it.
Anonymous
>>1347124 Yes, definately.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347228 you are def innately a retarded shill
Anonymous
>let me doxx you and your family chud!! why are leftists so evil?
Anonymous
>>1347423 It was Trump that doxed Vance though
Anonymous
>>1347431 he didn't publish the information to the Internet. this dossier is technically stolen.
Anonymous
>>1347434 Vance is a sitting US Senator. His address is in the public domain.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347480 The addresses of the campaign staff are not.
Anonymous
>>1347434 Still came from him
Anonymous
>>1347640 retarded take, now please go and get raped to death. that's like saying if you ever get doxed its facebook's fault that YOU posted the info up there and not the person who hacks into facebook takes all your info then puts a target on it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1347657 's intrusive thoughts>raped Weird
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1346971 klippenstein found out.