>>1350310>First 'Joker' movie loved by incels>to incels there's nothing wrong with women being raped>incels whine at their beloved villain being raped>OP would say women in India being raped is wrong if he's not IndianStrange. Stranger still, a scene in the first 'Joker' movie has as the background music 'Rock & Roll Part 2' by Gary Glitter, a convicted pedophile
And Joker
dies in the end. Good. DC did nothing wrong and the faggot OP is having a melty about it. Even better.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joker:_Folie_%C3%A0_Deux'Critics noted that the film was a work of metafiction, designed to intentionally antagonize audiences who were fans of the first film. Rather than capitulating to expectations of the predecessor's fanbase, the film serves to rebuke those who idolized the character of the Joker after the original movie. As a deliberate anti-audience effort, the film pushes against the notion of fan service, instead creating a self-aware narrative that is a commentary on its own existence'
'The finale where Arthur's crimes are trialed and he is made to seem sad and pathetic represents an effort by Phillips to subvert and undermine audiences who saw Arthur as heroic in the first film, and the trial reiterates the events of the first film in a way that is intended to be dissatisfying and alienating to audiences'
It's as if Warner Bros deliberately set out to make a movie that would fail, because they don't care about a villain and demonstrated that nobody else in their right mind would, either. But there are those without a mind that like a villain. But who cares about incels? Warner Bros don't, and neither do I. There are sequels that are better than the original. Godfather 2. Aliens. As for those who don't like this movie, incels who don't live in a society get what they fucking deserve. Warner Bros say 'So? Who cares? No biggie, this is just a tax writeoff, it won't harm us.' But it's harmed those who don't like this sequel. Good.
